there is, and can be, zero relationship between time on the list and/or effort, and senior games.
by that logic, we pick up Steve Morris in the mid season draft,
and play him on the ball in the firsts.
I also find the notion of debuting black people in the dreamtime game,
as ludicrous as debuting a cancer survivor against St.Kilda.
I accept thats probably just me.
My emphasis was on consistent effort and performance. [Note: I later edited to include Naish whom I simply forgot].
Form wavers, even for champions like Cotchin, but the players I mentioned have played far more senior footy recently than MRJ or Stack and have displayed strong form in previous VFL games and seasons.
One point I might have added but getting too wordy, was that I see other clubs more willing to persevere with young players rather than drop them immediately they put in a below-par performance. Hate to say it, but the Bummers are a good example with the likes of Parish, Langford, Laverde, Ham. Very different performance compared to RFC over last 4 years, sure, but often developing young players requires perseverance, trial in different positions perhaps, but not losing faith e.g. I'd like to see Naish brought in and told to run with Bailey Smith and see if he can curb/match him. Naish can find the ball and use it; he deserves a few games.
So you are mis-construing my point with more of your tawdry crap. Steve Morris? You think it's hilarious to drag him into it? Not even on the list for years! Could add more.
I know I've seen several other posters suggest DT a great time to debut for MRJ - have you had the same retort for all of them? Let's check.
For mine, I've already said - when the selectors think he's cherry-ripe for AFL - I'd be happy to wait for next year if that's what's best. But, I was thinking more along the lines of giving him more senior footy to build his tank and get more exposure to the bigger bodies for a kid from NTFL, so around mid-season. I'm not sure what you are trying to suggest or imply by resorting to this and another stupid analogy (and offensive).
But I have noticed your attacks on other posters who are dedicated enough to actually attend training sessions and file reports based on empirical observation rather than fanciful delusions. To hoist the remedy for the team's current woes on two young players currently playing good/ok footy in a couple of VFL matches, is farcical and unfair on them.
And if it was even tried and failed? Then what? You're missing the bigger picture - of course other teams have had 4 years to finally work out our game, have had access to some quality draftees/recruits chosen wisely for the current game, and have either implemented key elements of our style or measures to counter it. But you think the complete response is to throw in 2 young players after a couple of VFL games? Why? Because they're indigenous? One's father was MR? (Worked for Tommy Roach and Naishy, right?)
But I note you avoid responding to the actual points I made to instead resort to your usual fantasy BS and lame, offensive attempts at ridicule. Sometimes I'm amused by your posts, but you've never fooled me much. Like I've said previously, not sure what you grow on that farm.