2007 compared to 2004

[GoodOne]

Tackles usually equates to desperation, not always, but more likely than not. Most top teams do pressure alot. Richmond does, as disco's stats show, need to improve immenseley in this area.

 

[Disco08]

Tackles also can often lead to turnovers which in today's game of getting numbers back can sometimes be the easiest way to score goals. I don't think there can be anything to lose by tackling more so I'm not sure why Wallet doesn't seem interested in improving this area.

 

[tigerbeau]

This spoon doesn't even feel like a spoon to me this year because we were more competetive and unlucky to lose many games this year.

List is improving.

I feel the exact same. I think the media do to. The media was crucifing us in 2004, now they understand.

As a club and as it's supporters we know where we are heading.

 

[RROFO]

This spoon doesn't even feel like a spoon to me this year because we were more competitive and unlucky to lose many games this year.

List is improving.

I feel the exact same. I think the media do to. The media was crucifing us in 2004, now they understand.

As a club and as it's supporters we know where we are heading.

Sorry boys. A spoon's a spoon's a spoon. And I am embarrassed about it. Feels like a spoon to me.

But I'll give you that I think the list is basically better than in 2004.

 

[tigersforever06]

Look like to know how many 100+ point thrashings we had in 2004

Apart from GasparGate this year we didnt have any.

For me the diffence in the playing group is the key. This years playing group has huge potential for improvement and hopefully some good draft picks will help them along.

The playing list in 2004 had very little room for improvement and very few kids coming through.

We are heading in the right direction, but don't think anyone doesn't realise we still have a long way to go.

What do you call a 70+ loss to Geelong

A 10 goal loss to sydney

ect...