Fair old write up on Rich in the HS. (Note: you can get discount roast chickens in the HS today too. Awesome.)
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,24683176-19742,00.html
Interest in WA youngster Daniel Rich
Jon Anderson | November 21, 2008 12:00am
WELCOME to the world of AFL draft vernacular, where inside means tough and outside means petrified. Inside and outside players are just two of the many terms you will hear leading up to tomorrow week's 24th National AFL draft.
To illustrate the nature of the draft, and the thousands of verbal assessments muttered about 70-80 teenagers, let's take someone certain to be an early selection this year.
Daniel Rich, the brilliant Subiaco on-baller who has been playing successfully at senior level since 2007, has long been seen as part of a top-three trifecta made up of himself, tall Sandringham forward Jack Watts and Fijian-born West Australian jumping bean Nicholas Naitanui.
Suddenly that may not be the case with slight doubts cast over Rich's endurance and suggestions Fremantle are wavering towards Indigenous "outside runner" Stephen Hill with pick No. 3, given that Melbourne appears committed to Watts and West Coast to Naitanui.
And Rich may not be that disappointed given his preference was always said to be West Coast and moving interstate does not daunt him.
Another reason Fremantle may not select Rich is because of the presence of 2008 NAB Rising Star Rhys Palmer and Garrick Ibbotson in the Dockers' midfield plus the anticipated return of Paul Hasleby from a knee reconstruction.
Early beep tests (10.7) suggested a query on endurance, although that was from Rich's time at the AIS in January, 2007.
He has since increased that test to 13.01, which while passable is a fair way from the elite midfield runners.
But his 2.95sec for 20m suggest he is clearly quick enough for AFL level.
Such is the physiological testing done on the youngsters these days, that there have even been concerns raised about the length of his arms, prompting some recruiters to question whether his aerial skills will be below par in the more competitive AFL arena.
He also is perceived by some as having a mature body, meaning there may be minimal room for development compared to some youngsters who are yet to hit the weight room.
But one AFL recruiting manager contacted yesterday (he didn't want to be quoted but how many do a week out from the draft?) said clubs that ignore Rich early on will do so at their own peril.
"Jack Watts could be anything and Nicholas Naitanui is so far from his best it's impossible to tell where he will end," was his assessment.
"But for pure skill and displayed form, Daniel Rich is the most talented boy in the draft, just ahead of Hamish Hartlett."
If Rich is ignored by the Dockers, and given he is a Perth youngster it would be a massive call, then it's possible he could even slip through to pick six.
Port Adelaide's believed desire is for Hartlett, while Essendon, with pick No. 5, is expected to go for a key position player with Mal Michael retired and Dustin Fletcher, Matthew Lloyd and Scott Lucas not that far away from doing so.
That player would be Tyrone Vickery, leaving the Blues to have the luxury of adding Rich to a midfield containing Chris Judd, Mark Murphy, Nick Stevens and Bryce Gibbs.
Rich may well be the longest and most penetrating kick of that quartet (think Luke Hodge) which must be mouth-watering for Carlton full-forward Brendan Fevola.
But as good as Rich is, when it comes to the draft, and the way he is discussed, he's just another potential piece in the jigsaw.
His ability is such that most said about him is positive yet there are always room for negatives, even with the game's greats.
And don't forget it's only two years ago that a young Bendigo boy, originally touted as a potential No. 1 pick, slipped through to No. 7, and went on to play in a premiership side in his first season.
There's quite a few clubs wishing they'd taken Joel Selwood these days.