2009 - Preseason Preview - 7th of 16 - Geelong | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

2009 - Preseason Preview - 7th of 16 - Geelong

pahoffm

No one player is bigger than the club.
Mar 24, 2004
21,145
1
We didn't look at Geelong last year.
If we had, we might have seen a couple of the chinks that were exposed on GF day, last year. But, then again, it's easy to talk retrospectively.

Here is their positional depth:

B Wojcinski (28,180,132,45) Scarlett (29,192,206,16) Harley (30,193,184,11)
D.Johnson (27,181,71,16) Mackie (24,192,82,52) Rooke (27,189,112,34)
Gillies (19,192,0,0)
HB Enright (27,187,150,45) Egan (25,196,59,1) J.Hunt (27,185,122,16)
Milburn (31,189,235,87) Taylor (22,193,21,3) T.Hunt (18,183,0,0)
Laidler# (19,189,0,0) Weadon# (19,185,0,0)
C Corey (27,191,176,54) Ablett (24,182,146,191) Tenace (23,182,54,11)
Ling (28,189,182,106) Kelly (25,183,129,61) Donohue (19,182,0,0)
Selwood (20,182,45,13) Moles# (23,183,0,0)
HF S.Johnson (25,189,112,210) McKenna (19,195,0,0) Motlop (18,182,0,0)
Gamble (21,184,14,21) Simpson (19,196,0,0) Hogan (20,182,0,0)
F Mooney (29,195,168,206) Lonergan (24,197,23,42) Chapman (27,179,155,204)
Hawkins (20,197,19,25) Brown (18,195,0,0) Stokes (24,177,52,79)
Byrnes (24,175,54,27)
A.Varcoe# (18,179,0,0)
R Ottens (29,202,204,236) Bartel (25,187,133,84) T.Varcoe (20,180,34,29)
Blake (23,200,58,8) Allwright# (18,187,0,0) Djerrkura (20,176,0,0)
Mumford# (22,200,3,0) Ediriwickrama# (18,178,0,0)
West (21,198,6,1)
Simpson (20,206,0,0)
As we can see it looks very good & even and there is no doubt that Geelong will perform strongly in 2009.
However CHF still remains a problem for them and with McKenna & Simpson seemingly not yet ready, much will still rely on both Mooney & Ottens, now twilighters, to fill the key competitive marking positions.
We remember the great job Nathan Ablett performed in filling that hole in 2007.
CHFs win GFs.

Also, their smaller running backs are either getting long in the teeth or still in teenage years. Which may be why the Hawthorn mosquito fleet cut them up in the 2nd half of that big game.

For Geelong the last 2 years is now beginning to take them into the back end of their window.
Much will depend on how quickly they can get their youngens up playing top level AFL.

Eight games again at their favourite Kardinia Park gives them a good base to begin with.
An interesting year for the Cattery.
 

IanG

Tiger Legend
Sep 27, 2004
18,123
3,374
Melbourne
Phantom said:
As we can see it looks very good & even and there is no doubt that Geelong will perform strongly in 2009.
However CHF still remains a problem for them and with McKenna & Simpson seemingly not yet ready, much will still rely on both Mooney & Ottens, now twilighters, to fill the key competitive marking positions.
We remember the great job Nathan Ablett performed in filling that hole in 2007.
CHFs win GFs.

Surely Mooney is CHF. Ablett didn't really do a good job in 2007 either, he shouldn't have been in the GF side but was lucky that their lack of depth in that area meant that there was no alternative.
 

pahoffm

No one player is bigger than the club.
Mar 24, 2004
21,145
1
IanG said:
Surely Mooney is CHF. Ablett didn't really do a good job in 2007 either, he shouldn't have been in the GF side but was lucky that their lack of depth in that area meant that there was no alternative.

Mooney did have a very good 2007 GF. But then, so did pretty well all the team.

Last year they tended to play him closer to goal.

Mooney does become their key tall focus by way of a lack of other options.
That's probably the reason why they've recruited Simpson (196), McKenna (195) & Brown (195) in the last couple of drafts.

Not sure what their thinking is on Hawkins. 20yo, 19 games in 2 years for 25 goals on limited opportunity is a very good effort.
Yet there seems to be this lingering hesitation by them towards him.
(The ox is slow but the Earth is patient.)
 

mtench

Tiger Champion
May 9, 2007
2,704
4
WINCHELSEA
Phantom said:
Mooney did have a very good 2007 GF. But then, so did pretty well all the team.

Last year they tended to play him closer to goal.

Mooney does become their key tall focus by way of a lack of other options.
That's probably the reason why they've recruited Simpson (196), McKenna (195) & Brown (195) in the last couple of drafts.

Not sure what their thinking is on Hawkins. 20yo, 19 games in 2 years for 25 goals on limited opportunity is a very good effort.
Yet there seems to be this lingering hesitation by them towards him.
(The ox is slow but the Earth is patient.)
They played closer to goal except when it counted in the grand final!

On Hawkins i think injurys have played a part in his lack of games, i think you'll find he is there prefered option.
 
Jul 26, 2004
78,689
39,638
www.redbubble.com
Very odd not to have included Hawkins and Mooney in key forward possies Phantom.

Despite the Hawks premiership i still believe the Cats were the outstanding team in the competition but the history books won't show it.

Will be top 2 again.
 

toothless

Tiger Champion
Aug 16, 2009
4,230
3,325
B: Milburn Scarlett Kelly
HB: Mackie Taylor Enright
C: Corey Bartel Ling
HF: S.Johnson Mooney Chapman
F: Rooke Hawkins T.Varcoe
Foll: Ottens, Selwood, Ablett
Inter: J.Hunt, Wojcinski, Byrnes, Blake
Emerg: Hogan, Drum, Gamble