I read Rowsten at 19 and stopped. Not a bad player I suppose, but 19 in the land?In Doerre’s “long awaited” (his words) Top 100 Power Rankings (ie not his Phantom Draft referred to earlier), and not withstanding he has 15 mature ages from rankings 41 to 55, he has Matthew Jefferson rated 64th.
Michalenney 78th. Gruzewski 76th. Drury 74th. Lemmey 86th. And other strange rankings….
Have always thought he’s a bit weird and not that reliable and his latest video confirms that for me.
Yeah its been interesting being able to analyse and compare the 'pros' this year. Its confirmed what I've suspected and what a lot of PRE posters have said over the years. Its a huge task to systematically analyse the draft prospects, massive. if a comprehensive analysis of the draft is 100%, normally I would have done 5%, this year I've put a fair bit of time in and done maybe a 20-25% effort? I reckon the small cohort of pros who do it are there simply because they are willing to do it, have a working knowledge of footy and can string a sentence together, not necessarily because of talent, and they'd do a 50-60% job, being generous?
CD is all over the shop, but obviously he puts the time in, but more on the computer than at games I'd say. CT just talks to all the recruiters and managers, doesn't make too many calls himself, Rookie me central is totally random, a few kernels of good analysis but no consistency of amount or quality, I'd say they wouldn't have many resources. I think PRE is a good a source as any. Just one poster, Bullus, leaves CD for dead IMO on being across the field. Then there is the discussion, which the pros don't have, which is great.
Last edited: