- Sep 23, 2003
I've defined it often and clearly enough. I'm just seeing if anyone was actually paying attention.
Nah nah nah, I've got a secret. Guess what it is!antman said:The position you are taking is to demand other people define your position and then ask them point out what's wrong with the position they've defined for you. That's an awesomely logical stance dude.
Yeah, problem is we've exhausted the material, we need Duckman to come up with some keeerazy theories that we can get stuck into... so for now we've descended into hissy fits and mutual insults simply to keep the thread going.tigergollywog said:as entertaining as it can be, this thread is becoming increasingly unbecoming. all the past tense talk suggests the protagonists are over it, yet strangely addicted.
sweet mother of jesus. Everyone knows what the trufers posi is. I've seen the film, read the book, one of them tried to sell me the T-Shirt at ground zero, I spoke to a heap of them face to face, at length. I said it earlier. They, and you, say 'oh we just want an inquiry for the kids of those who were killed' or whatever but thats all crap. I'm not buying it for a second.Disco08 said:LOL. You guys think you're critical thinking realists but you can't even define the position you're being irrationally critical of. What a joke.
And you reckon I wasn't paying attention? I explained very clearly and at length the very predictable and rational reasons why the US would not have been candid in the 9/11 inquiry. Power Politics 101 I termed it. Another example of ignoring counter arguments and ploughing on regardless.Disco08 said:Well close. The position is the demand for a proper inquiry. No need for emotive embellishment. The evidence that supports that position is clean and clear.
Why you think it's crap is anyone's guess.
Exactly. Before one even considers their arguments, a priori it is a ludicrous position - I touched on this pretty early in the thread. Truthers want the government to investigate themselves with a finding that they did it. Yeah, like that is going to happen.tigersnake said:Also, its crap because logically why else would truthers want an inquiry? Total bullsh!t. The truthers think the truth is that 9/11 was government orchestrated. You might fool yourself but you ain't fooling me.
You'll find it clearly stated on any of the more respected 9/11 truth sites tim.tigertim said:Where is there position published and by whom?
That is very disappointing Disco. My reply wasn't about respect for you. I respect you immensely. You asked a question then rather than give the answer you asked for others perceptions. My comments were simply a response on how I perceive your posting on this particular thread. I don't think you showed any respect when you called me snide, condescending and mocking for saying I found things entertaining early in the thread either. I respect your right to feel that way about my posting though, even though I think you were way off the mark. I hold no grudges for those comments. I don't know why you'd take offence at an answer you asked for when it's just the way I see it. I'm really sorry that has upset you. Very sorry indeed. Considering your response I'll delete my post.Disco08 said:rosy - as a score out of 10 on scale of respect to me you score 0. You can have my resignation as any type of support to you and this community effective as of right now. I'd reply to your points individually but life's way too short.