Ian4 said:But from a personal POV, the joy that this club brings to its fans shows no bounds. You can spin it however you want, but this club has more substance on its pinky than the whole of the RFC combined. I'm passionate about this club because they are winners. And I've spent my whole life following a bunch of losers. Makes a big difference to the psyche, believe me.
Ian4 said:All jokes aside, it was a cracking game, especially the first half. No doubt in my mind we deserved the 3 points, despite some suggestions of offside for our second goal.
But from a personal POV, the joy that this club brings to its fans shows no bounds. You can spin it however you want, but this club has more substance on its pinky than the whole of the RFC combined. I'm passionate about this club because they are winners. And I've spent my whole life following a bunch of losers. Makes a big difference to the psyche, believe me.
Harry said:Victory clearly the better side should have won by more. City got some big problems can't create enough chances. Haven't replaced the loss of Mooy ans Novillo.
Harry said:Victory clearly the better side should have won by more. City got some big problems can't create enough chances. Haven't replaced the loss of Mooy ans Novillo.
antman said:Yeah, was surprised Caceras didn't get a run, maybe he was injured. Turns out I got to the game as a got an early leave pass from the engagement party and a friend scored tix in the City Gold section lol. Sitting on the touchline far wing, nice.
Saw City had 67% possession, which is very one-sided, yet were so open at the back on the counter-attack. The loss of Jacobsen for this game hurt them as Kilkenny had to play as a true centre-half rather than drifting into midfield as he has done in previous games. Despite this I think most teams have worked out how to play over and around the City midfield press which worked so well in the first five games.
I felt Victory's back four won us the game - despite City's possession they had almost no clear cut chances and Brandan/Fornarolli/Cahill could not create in that final third. Classic Cahill headed goal though. Then once they turned it over Victory were away.
Props to two City boys - the young centre half who was partly responsible for the last goal, but looks a quality player. And to Luke Brattan, despite doing the groin in the first half played through it and still contributed. I couldn't believe he wasn't subbed off.
taztiger4 said:He came in with a groin injury, was warming up in front of us before the game & was clearly hindered
Harry said:Victory clearly the better side should have won by more. City got some big problems can't create enough chances. Haven't replaced the loss of Mooy ans Novillo.
Ian4 said:All jokes aside, it was a cracking game, especially the first half. No doubt in my mind we deserved the 3 points, despite some suggestions of offside for our second goal.
But from a personal POV, the joy that this club brings to its fans shows no bounds. You can spin it however you want, but this club has more substance on its pinky than the whole of the RFC combined. I'm passionate about this club because they are winners. And I've spent my whole life following a bunch of losers. Makes a big difference to the psyche, believe me.
TigerForce said:The club's only an adolescent at 12 years of age. The bad times will come as it happens in any sports league. Watch the mass exodus then.
That goal was definitely off-side, but then again who cares...
antman said: