The other point is that, at a time when our players are being criticised for being too self-centred and not team orientated enough, do we really want blokes who are wanting to leave their own clubs for a bit of extra cash?
Mr Pumblechook said:The other point is that, at a time when our players are being criticised for being too self-centred and not team orientated enough, do we really want blokes who are wanting to leave their own clubs for a bit of extra cash?
Mr Pumblechook said:The other point is that, at a time when our players are being criticised for being too self-centred and not team orientated enough, do we really want blokes who are wanting to leave their own clubs for a bit of extra cash?
Dyer Disciple said:Excellent point, I didn't realise he was still in contract and wanting more cash. I don't like that.![]()
Mr Pumblechook said:The other point is that, at a time when our players are being criticised for being too self-centred and not team orientated enough, do we really want blokes who are wanting to leave their own clubs for a bit of extra cash?
Streak said:And really, is he that good a player? He is tall and gets a lot of hitouts, but his around the ground work is still pretty average. And the Dockers don't seem to win the clearances like they should with such a dominant ruckman. SO is the issue the freo midfield, or the ruckman who gets his hand to it first but can't direct it down to advantage.
Streak said:My belief is that any trade involving Sandilands will not cost as much as people might think. The Hawks first rounder will probably do it.
The Dockers are between a rock and a hard place here. If he will not re-sign with them, they risk losing him for nothing to the GC, who can swoop as soon as he is out of contract. And I have heard that the Hawks have a contingency plan in place, with a deal to get him from GC in a trade.
Doesn't leave the Dockers a lot of room in which to move if it is true.
Go Toigs! said:Would you make the same comment if it was Mathew Scarlett or Judd looking for a new club?