lamb22 said:The players should say that they agree to in season testing for performancing enhancing drugs and tell the AFL they should screw themselves in relation to testing for recreational drugs.
If the AFL don't agree the players should go on strike.
The present scenario was a good attempt at harm minimisation where players VOLUNTARILY accepted more restrictions on their lives in return for a welfare based approach.
However due to the nongs in the press and the general public sensationalising what appears to be drug use well below the norm in society we have come to this witchhunt and bull$hit bastardry masquerading as brainless middle class morality.
Amen, brother.lamb22 said:If we are serious we should have every employee bow into a breathalyser each morning and anyone above 0.0 should be sacked on the spot.
They could have them at Centrelink and we can save heaps by stripping pensioners, the disabled and the unemployed of their benefits.
They could do random audits of the homeless and those without benefits could get the lash instead.
It never ceases to amaze me how the common man or woman in the street has such contempt for notions such as freedom of choice and freedom of expression.
It really doesn't take much to rouse the torpid from their slumber with the prospect of a good stoning of someone not quite like us. (or like us, but NOT actully us)