Mince was about to burst when he said it. What did he do? Fell into a pond or something?Hey stop making fun of him.
Drunk. Chasing two dogs. Tripped over and into a pond (code for sewage hole) in his backyard.Mince was about to burst when he said it. What did he do? Fell into a pond or something?
That's probably where he banged his head and started to dream Bolts is a definite for his Bummers. What a dill.Drunk. Chasing two dogs. Tripped over and into a pond (code for sewage hole) in his backyard.
Now incoherently rambling about the Mackay incident.
Oh and Ryan’s kick was 14.5m …so close enough.That's probably where he banged his head and started to dream Bolts is a definite for his Bummers. What a dill.
I heard that.When one of the journos broke up on Zoom in the presser, Buckley said 'Hang on, you're channelling Robbo".
Nearly spat at the TV when I saw that. How about the ball just hitting the ground when that bearded goof grabbed it??Oh and Ryan’s kick was 14.5m …so close enough.
Not sure of the methodology or technology used but Mince says it’s ok so it must be ok.
No. It’s all good. Mince has spoken.Nearly spat at the TV when I saw that. How about the ball just hitting the ground when that bearded goof grabbed it??
Is Mince going to get the virtual tape measure out like he did for the mark that Cameron wasn’t paid against the Swans?Oh and Ryan’s kick was 14.5m …so close enough.
Not sure of the methodology or technology used but Mince says it’s ok so it must be ok.
Which still isn't 15.He did get the tape out, that's where the 14.5 came from.
Oh and Ryan’s kick was 14.5m …so close enough.
Not sure of the methodology or technology used but Mince says it’s ok so it must be ok.
Ha ha really I was taking the *smile*. Fair enough but my grade 3 maths tells me 14.5 is not 15. Is the media up in arms about it like the Cameron mark?He did get the tape out, that's where the 14.5 came from.
Yep. Roughly measuring on TV doesn't even look 10m.I don't know what *smile* measuring stick he used but that was not 14.5 meters. Funny on the couch they said 10-11 meters. Most comments I've read have been saying 8-10 meters. What I can say categorically that kick was not 15 mts, so play on!!!
Agree. I’m venting. Still pissed at blowing that game.I'm not sure paying a mark .5 metres short will be at the top of the pile of umpire errors needing attention from the weekend.
no discussion on the dangerous tackle free?
The randomness of when a throw free kick is payed is infuriating. They happen constantly and are mostly ignored. Holding the ball is also infuriating but there are a lot of variables. What exactly is prior? Ump often apparently says 'no prior' just to justify not paying it, because more often than not there is prior. Or if he feels like paying it, or to justify paying it he might say 'dragged it it in' when he didn't, or he might say 'no genuine attempt' when there was, or at least just as much of a fake genuine attempt as the prior ones than weren't paid. It does my head in, Complete debacle.How about the one that actually resulted in a goal? The Grimes handball. Looked like a clear handball to me. Considering some of the "disposals" let go every week, its crazy how they picked that one out.
Another was paid today in the Pies vs Dees game. Player head didnt hit ground but they "deemed " it dangerous. Confused players.no discussion on the dangerous tackle free?
Another was paid today in the Pies vs Dees game. Player head didnt hit ground but they "deemed " it dangerous. Confused players.