se7en said:funny skimming through the thread from the start
Some us couldn't wait to get rid of him early on. :hihi
In fairness we were still traumatised by JON, and Rance's decision-making was very JONesque.
se7en said:funny skimming through the thread from the start
Some us couldn't wait to get rid of him early on. :hihi
tigerrookie1 said:Second in the afl for marks. Go rancey
tigers80 said:some went early on this bloke...lol
Tigers of Old said:His overhead marking has improved astronomically from a couple of years ago.
ToraToraTora said:So *smile*in what. Rance making it is a massive exception to the rule as far as Richmond recruits go. Used to be able pick a dud in 5 minutes.
I think you're right there. It's a good thing to see a player continuing their improvement.frangalis4eva said:i would think he's coming 2nd in the b n f atm behind cotch
rinso17 said:Absolutely slaughtered Podsiadly today. Absolutely slaughtered him
You can add Grimes as well.SCOOP said:True but wasn’t a day for tall forwards. None could clunk them. But took a couple of strong pack marks.
Locked in the back half for the next 10 years.
Yes, but there's no way they'll give it to him. I'm sure they're chalking Pods' performance up to a dirty day for him, not anything Rance did. It takes years for the selectors of the AA side and the media to let go of an initial negative perception.mtench said:Is all Australian a fair call at this stage?
Tigers of Old said:Just wondering why NikNat's rushed point on the siren was credited?
If Rance touches the ball after the siren sounds isn't that when play is dead regardless of it then continuing over the line?
Can someone clarify this?