Phantom said:Without knowing exactly, I'd say they probably did something similar.
But that was 2-3 years ago. The dynamic changes within an organisation over that time.
I know that with one very major interstate govt organisation that we're working with, they've done MLQ360s with they're leaders in early 2006, they're currently testing the same group with a new set of MLQ360s, and they are going to measure the variation in dynamics with a CLR = Comparative Longitudinal Report.
Funny, you know,
We've been working with the number one car company in the world, incidentally the major sponsor of the AFL, helping them to become #1 over a few years, yet some here think that we're above all of this.
I think it's a marvellous opportunity for the RFC.
I ask, who needs the reality check?
Skills said:No offense Phantom, but I'd rather have all these guy's focusing their energies at meeting their KPI's first, before finding the time to complete fashionable MLQ's.
K3 said:So Phantom, what kind of discount can you get the club? ;D
Skills said:I dont believe this...we loose a game by 157 pts and all of a sudden PRE becomes the McKinsey Home page. :hihi
Phantom said:Yes, I just watched it too.
Just a bit worried that the head of the organisation might be going into panic mode.
Keep a steady head Gary.
Remember the 5 key factors of great leaders.
1. Trust
2. Integrity
3. Inspire
4. Innovative thinking
5. Coaching others
Skills said:I dont believe this...we loose a game by 157 pts and all of a sudden PRE becomes the McKinsey Home page. :hihi
Phantom said:As said previously,
I'd like to do the following:
An MLQ360 on each of Wallace, Wright, Miller & Johnson
An MLQ Self-rating test on each of the juniors.
An MLQ Team each of the Leadership groups.
And an ODQ on the whole RFC organisation.
Just might paint a very enlightening picture.
I could arrange it for a cut price too.![]()