Bad coaching

[futuretigers]

now dont get me rong i like wallace as much as the next guy but against the kangas brent harvey carved us up and to have jackson on him was a bad matchup he was much too quick for him and just ran him ruggerd i like jackson as a player but i dont beleive matching him up on a player he cannot run with is bad matup and bad coaching....

opinions? ???

 

[Inspector]

now dont get me rong i like wallace as much as the next guy but against the kangas brent harvey carved us up and to have jackson on him was a bad matchup he was much too quick for him and just ran him ruggerd i like jackson as a player but i dont beleive matching him up on a player he cannot run with is bad matup and bad coaching....

opinions? ???

Think we only had 2 options who could have tagged Harvey Foley or King. Wouldn't use Foley because we need him to get our clearances so King I thought would have been the best option.

 

[Tigermad2005]

Not our Terry.

 

[gustiger12]

now dont get me rong i like wallace as much as the next guy but against the kangas brent harvey carved us up and to have jackson on him was a bad matchup he was much too quick for him and just ran him ruggerd i like jackson as a player but i dont beleive matching him up on a player he cannot run with is bad matup and bad coaching....

opinions? ???

Think we only had 2 options who could have tagged Harvey Foley or King. Wouldn't use Foley because we need him to get our clearances so King I thought would have been the best option.

Your right here Inspector. The Foley factor is becoming a big concern for us. If otherside close him down we have nothing left in the midfield. Tuck can be ok but is more a second tier mid and if opposition close down Foley we are in trouble and that problem has just been exacerbated by the injury to Lids. This is a major concern for us me thinks. Some interesting draft selections coming up.

 

[geoffryprettyboy]

now dont get me rong i like wallace as much as the next guy but against the kangas brent harvey carved us up and to have jackson on him was a bad matchup he was much too quick for him and just ran him ruggerd i like jackson as a player but i dont beleive matching him up on a player he cannot run with is bad matup and bad coaching....

opinions? ???

Build a very strong bridge & get over it.

We need to gear up for the Hawks this week, we require all the focus forward in our planning to beat the Turds :hihi.

 

[Tigerdog]

Petrie kicked 6 on Thursty. Why did we get Polak? And if Polak is now doing Bowdens role from last year... what's Bowden doing?
The coaching of our side is very questionable IMO. Take JON as an example. Is a natural winger yet plays as an undersized chb for the Burgers. No wonder he has lost confidence. He has probably never played back in his life.
You can bet the kp back we desperately need will be filled by a junior forward who has never played back in his life. But no matter. Our player development record is so strong that it will be a seamless transition for the kid.

 

[bertallen]

now dont get me rong i like wallace as much as the next guy but against the kangas brent harvey carved us up and to have jackson on him was a bad matchup he was much too quick for him and just ran him ruggerd i like jackson as a player but i dont beleive matching him up on a player he cannot run with is bad matup and bad coaching....

opinions? ???

Think we only had 2 options who could have tagged Harvey Foley or King. Wouldn't use Foley because we need him to get our clearances so King I thought would have been the best option.

Your right here Inspector. The Foley factor is becoming a big concern for us. If otherside close him down we have nothing left in the midfield. Tuck can be ok but is more a second tier mid and if opposition close down Foley we are in trouble and that problem has just been exacerbated by the injury to Lids. This is a major concern for us me thinks. Some interesting draft selections coming up.

I thought it was explained quite consisely that the players weren't switched on or hard and tight from the start, and then the disposal turned to poo, not a problem with matchups at all really.

(poor skill and a lack of effort meant his side never looked a chance against the Kangaroos. Fundamental errors and misuse of the ball in the backline were reasons for the 25-point loss. The scoreboard flattered us a little.
“We had too many down on the night and made too many mistakes,” “There were some really uncharacteristic acts early in the game and I didn’t think our guys were hard enough or tight enough. “I didn’t think our mental edge was anywhere near what it had been over the past five or six weeks.”)

 

[tigersforever06]

Our midfield is just pathetic. You can call it bad coaching or you can say its quite simply the fact that the oppositions first 3 midfielders are better then our 1st

Facts are facts

 

[Inspector]

now dont get me rong i like wallace as much as the next guy but against the kangas brent harvey carved us up and to have jackson on him was a bad matchup he was much too quick for him and just ran him ruggerd i like jackson as a player but i dont beleive matching him up on a player he cannot run with is bad matup and bad coaching....

opinions? ???

Think we only had 2 options who could have tagged Harvey Foley or King. Wouldn't use Foley because we need him to get our clearances so King I thought would have been the best option.

Your right here Inspector. The Foley factor is becoming a big concern for us. If otherside close him down we have nothing left in the midfield. Tuck can be ok but is more a second tier mid and if opposition close down Foley we are in trouble and that problem has just been exacerbated by the injury to Lids. This is a major concern for us me thinks. Some interesting draft selections coming up.

The quicker we get younger guys in to replace the hard bodies of Tuck & Johnson etc the better hopefully guys like Conners can get a motor because I think he could become an inside mid have not seen Collins play at all but he is from all reports pretty skilled but skinny.