the claw said:
a couple of yrs ago. what are you talking about. the only player who has changed poistion to better himself is ling and that was at the start of his afl career.mooney is just an average player in a good side who performs an important role.hes got better at the role as time has gone on. ditto for steve johnson he has never really played anywhere but forward for geelong.at the age of 24 he came of age and so he should at that age in fact he was pushing it an ordinary 2007 might have seen him in trouble.
bowden has gone from a failed mid to an unaccoutable back to what a mid again.
i said 3 or 5 yrs ago bowden should be played forward or traded no one wanted to know then. now hes been shown up for what he has always been people want to give him a new role at 30 at bloody 30. why i ask the only answer i can come up with is sentiment.
for this old simpleton things are simple. most things in football are black and white i wonder if by being able to cut thru the crap and keeping things simple that doesnt make me a tad smarter than most ferals.
most things i have said over the yrs have come to fruition the rfc has slowly adapted kicking and creaming along the way mind a lot of what i have advocated yrs ago.
man management is about identifying what role people are capable of and what they are incapable of.while they are young you try to develop other areas of their games. you then place that person with that role into the structure of your team.
all of his career joel has shown he is capable of just one role. unfortunately for him we have better quicker younger people at the club now performing that role.
My Point here Claw is that while you can simply decide that some players are not going to be the future of the club, at some point you have to try and maximise the resources you have available to you. If Joel Bowden is not one of the best 22 players in terms of general ability that we have on our list then I would concede that his time has come - as it certainly has (in my opinion) with Tivers, Pettifer etc and several of the younger guys.
In my opinion Bowden is comfortably in our best 22 skill wise and is of an age and experience level that we sorely lack (thanks Frawley). I would go so far as to say that we would be somewhere around 1 and a half games further up the table had he played the last few weeks.
Now the response I expect is that 'so what, we are not going to win it this year' and that would be correct, but I can only think Bowden would be a positive influence on the younger guys regardless of Frawley's worthless comments and success breeds confidence more than anything.
Finally, my point in naming a few Geelong guys is that a team is not simply who is 'good' and who isn't; it is a combination of many things, including confidence and culture. If the argument is simply that Bowden is a poison for the culture or isn't (as has been said many times about pretty much every player of value at Richmond in the last 20 years - Campbell, Johnston, Richo and Daffy are probably the marque targets) then I would again site the three Geelong players I named previously who WERE considered to be symptomatic of the cultural problems at Geelong, less than a year prior to their premiership.
The problem with black and white is that it doesn't allow for change. It doesn't allow for emotion and it certainly doesn't allow for gradual improvement. You are right on many issues Claw but my point remains that it is simplistic in a competition where we have a limited number of experienced players, to simply decide that the only way to improve is to remove every less-that-perfect player in the HOPE that the new ones are born with an innate possession of cultural and natural superiority that will replace the dominant culture as if by magic.
I am looking forward to seeing how Bowden goes for the rest of this year. He does need to improve, he does need contribute and if he doesn't the he will be forced out of the side on merit, which is the kind of culture I want at Richmond.