BOWER / DRUM/ MILLS / CLARK. ??????? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

BOWER / DRUM/ MILLS / CLARK. ???????

craig

Tiger Legend
Aug 19, 2004
50,398
38,213
Melbourne
Miller can i ask why we took a small with our most important draft pick instead of a quality tall such as Clark or Mills, Drum or Bower when they were all availabvle along with Hughes.

The RFC desperately needs future key Forwards and Backs and at least we got Hughes however we most certainly should have taken Mills and the fact that the Lions have taken Mills and Clark makes me very annoyed and leaves me with the sense of resignation that the tigers are not going anywhere for a few years yet in fact i am positive about that.

And yep be advised i am going to be comparing Oakley Nicholls against Mills, Clark, Drum, and Bower for the next few years to see how he goes, while the tigers lament in the bottom half if not bottom third of the ladder.

WE NEEDED A CHB A CHF AND a quality small MILLER now we still have no key defensive prospects and have to put up with Hall what a joke Miller you are losing me my man and very very quickly. Now im just waiting for you to draft Bullen, or Stevens or Haynes just to prove your stupidity.

Good luck to the Hyphen and i hope he goes well and i look forward to seeing him run around, and i do not mean to come across as disrespectful to the lad, i really hope he goes well and i do know yhe is rated highly, however we needed another tall and this draft was one of the best for young talls there has been for a while and the tigers wasted a very very good chance to kick start their re building phase in regard to a spine which i believe is a mistake and will hurt us in 2 years.
 
craig said:
Miller can i ask why we took a small with our most important draft pick instead of a quality tall such as Clark or Mills, Drum or Bower when they were all availabvle along with Hughes.

The RFC desperately needs future key Forwards and Backs and at least we got Hughes however we most certainly should have taken Mills and the fact that the Lions have taken Mills and Clark makes me very annoyed and leaves me with the sense of resignation that the tigers are not going anywhere for a few years yet in fact i am positive about that.

And yep be advised i am going to be comparing Oakley Nicholls against Mills, Clark, Drum, and Bower for the next few years to see how he goes, while the tigers lament in the bottom half if not bottom third of the ladder.

WE NEEDED A CHB A CHF AND a quality small MILLER now we still have no key defensive prospects and have to put up with Hall what a joke Miller you are losing me my man and very very quickly. Now im just waiting for you to draft Bullen, or Stevens or Haynes just to prove your stupidity.

Good luck to the Hyphen and i hope he goes well and i look forward to seeing him run around, and i do not mean to come across as disrespectful to the lad, i really hope he goes well and i do know yhe is rated highly, however we needed another tall and this draft was one of the best for young talls there has been for a while and the tigers wasted a very very good chance to kick start their re building phase in regard to a spine which i believe is a mistake and will hurt us in 2 years.
a claw in the making..........
 
Ghost Who Walks said:
It would have been better if we did not pass on 67.

That will hurt us as we could have got some good KPP or a Ruckman.

You do realise we have a pick in the PSD?
 
Yes I do.

It would be better than some recycled player who did not make the grade at another club or someone in the twilight of there career.

Thats is why I feel we erred by not using selection 67.
 
We haven't ruled out taking someone in the PSD who missed out on this draft. I'm guessing though we'll take them in the rookie draft and give em a year or two to develop.