I'm not sure why we are taking two rookies when other teams are taking up to six.
Is it because the number of players already on the list?
Is it because of budgetary constraints?
Is it because of club policy?
I thought the rookie list was expanded so every team had to have a minimum number of ?? - in order to keep the poorer clubs from being disadvantaged?
You just have to look at the gems that can come out of the rookie system to know you should have as many as possible.
Whatever the reason, we will be disadvantaged unless we have the same number of rookies as every other team.
What gives? :veryupset
Is it because the number of players already on the list?
Is it because of budgetary constraints?
Is it because of club policy?
I thought the rookie list was expanded so every team had to have a minimum number of ?? - in order to keep the poorer clubs from being disadvantaged?
You just have to look at the gems that can come out of the rookie system to know you should have as many as possible.
Whatever the reason, we will be disadvantaged unless we have the same number of rookies as every other team.
What gives? :veryupset