Brodders17 said:I'll predict ins: Post, Webberley and Helbig,
then the same 22 will run as last week.
close.
official ins are:
Webberley, Helbig and Farmer
interesting to see Farmer in contention so quickly.
Brodders17 said:I'll predict ins: Post, Webberley and Helbig,
then the same 22 will run as last week.
And he has done nothing Coburg. :Brodders17 said:close.
official ins are:
Webberley, Helbig and Farmer
interesting to see Farmer in contention so quickly.
Brodders17 said:interesting to see Farmer in contention so quickly.
Barnzy said:I'd like to see Helbig again, like the look of him. Also give us another mid-size target up forward who pushes into the midfield rotations which allows Martin to spend more time in his long-term position of midfield instead of filling gaps up forward a lot more than he would be (even though he's awesome up there too). If he played he would probably be sub though, so could come in early or late in 3rd for a player like White.
Tigers of Old said:More likelihood of Helbig than Morts atm. Seems to be right on the nose.
Would love to have it confirmed why he's dropped off Dimma's radar.
Barnzy said:I dunno.
It's obvious the coaching staff have their favourites and not everyone is held to the same standards. Rightly or wrongly.
Some players have to play very well and consistently at a lower level, others don't (Nason, Farmer, Helbig, etc) and get easy inclusions.
I'm not trying to make an argument here all I'm just saying I don't think it's very debatable. People can make their own minds up about it.
gustiger12 said:Its been a long time since we've had a side this settled. Not because we don't have anyone to elevate, but because those getting a game are earning it. Even Edwards has done enough to hold his own in the last couple of weeks. You wouldn't want to let your performances slip now, or people will be climbing all over you.
Barnzy said:I dunno.
It's obvious the coaching staff have their favourites and not everyone is held to the same standards. Rightly or wrongly.
Some players have to play very well and consistently at a lower level, others don't (Nason, Farmer, Helbig, etc) and get easy inclusions.
I'm not trying to make an argument here all I'm just saying I don't think it's very debatable. People can make their own minds up about it.
tha8ball said:No hall, no Higgins, no lake = no excuses IMO.
All three have been crucial in beating us in previous matches. Not overating us blah blah blah - But this is a very winnable game for the club pure and simple.
DirtyDogTiger said:no williams wither
that's the Full back, Centre half back, full forwards, and a midfielder
and they're playing poorly and we're on fire, and full strength
we can't lose this,
tha8ball said:No hall, no Higgins, no lake = no excuses IMO.
All three have been crucial in beating us in previous matches. Not overating us blah blah blah - But this is a very winnable game for the club pure and simple.