Harry said:what happened to the zero tackles and youre out theory?
Who had zero ?
Harry said:what happened to the zero tackles and youre out theory?
Don't normally comment on umpires as I think generally it all evens out in the end but the umpires had an absolute shocker. They're completely confused with the hands in the back rule. I'll wait for the stats but I'd be surprised if Adelaide didnt get 7 goals from frees or 50 metre penalties and a good portion of those were incorrect decisions. Two very bad decisions against Moore stuck out a mile.Inspector said:Umps don't handball into trouble!!
CarnTheTiges said:Why change? Aside from Thirsty who is injured. Come on guys we're tanking. We need that PP so bad we're going to go out there and embarass ourselves every single week from now until the end of the season. Terry will get the ultimate prize; the PP and be rewarded, because the PP is now far more important than the Premiership, and next season just like Carlton we'll burn up the ladder. We don't need to change anything. Let's just keep playing that side. At least until Johnno is fit, then we can drop that Cotchin bloke, he seems to want to actually play well and win games, what's up with him? Maybe we can also give Deledio a holiday at Coburg, he makes it bloody hard to lose games, too.
TimTamMan said:For those calling on Tivers, Petters, Bowdeners to be omitted, I agree, but lets say thank you and goodluck with your future endeavours and for once have the Richmond Football club farewell these men properly - not like what happened with Knights.
agree,but add bowden to that list also.bowden4president said:Not all will happen but some of the following should
possible Outs: Tivendale (for good), Polak, Mcmahon, Edwards(needs a run at coburg), Pettifer, Thursfield (inj) Pattison(just not good enough)
possible Ins: Collins (it has to happen NOW) Riewoldt, Conners (even half fit would have to be better than Mcmuffin) Polo, Hughes(give him another shot), Rance, Graham, Morton
Thats not bad, looks a good young side with a sprinkling of experience. Damn it's worth a shottigers#7 said:For the tenth time Schulz was playing on Jericho! It looked like McGuane was playing on him because he had to cover for bloody Schulz all the time. Anyway...........
Well from todays Coburg game........its obvious they're hungry to play senior footy, so the following changes should happen..........
IN: Rance Collins Polo Riewoldt Hughes Oakley-Nicholls Morton
OUT: Thursfield Tivendale Polak Schulz Pettifer Bowden McMahon
FB: McGuane Rance King
HB: Newman Moore Oakley-Nicholls
C: Polo Foley Richardson
HF: Morton Hughes Tambling
FF: Brown Riewoldt Edwards
R: Simmonds Cotchin Deledio
INT: Collins White Pattison Tuck
One could only hope :hmm
A bit hard on Bowden and Schulz No 7. I'd say both did better than Newman. I'd retain all three.tigers#7 said:For the tenth time Schulz was playing on Jericho! It looked like McGuane was playing on him because he had to cover for bloody Schulz all the time. Anyway...........
Well from todays Coburg game........its obvious they're hungry to play senior footy, so the following changes should happen..........
IN: Rance Collins Polo Riewoldt Hughes Oakley-Nicholls Morton
OUT: Thursfield Tivendale Polak Schulz Pettifer Bowden McMahon
FB: McGuane Rance King
HB: Newman Moore Oakley-Nicholls
C: Polo Foley Richardson
HF: Morton Hughes Tambling
FF: Brown Riewoldt Edwards
R: Simmonds Cotchin Deledio
INT: Collins White Pattison Tuck
One could only hope :hmm
zero tackles.Redford said:Who had zero ?
How can especially a backman or a midfielder have ZERO tackles?mopsy fraser said:zero tackles.
newman
richo
cotchin
simmonds
mcguane
edwards
thursfield
and these only had 1 tackle.
lids
polak
schulz
pettifer
these had 2 tackles.
bowden
jordan
tambling
3 tackles.
patto
kel moore
4 tackles.
brown
white
king
6 tackles.
tuck
tivva
7 tackles.
foley
for the pathetic total figure of 47 tackles.