-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Changes vs Melbourne
- Thread starter tigers#7
- Start date
6 compulsory changes this week
6 compulsory changes this week
in: reiwoldt out: polak
in: hughes out: bowden
in: morton out: pettifer
in: polo out: mcmahon
in: jackson out: tivendale
in: rance out: thursfield injured
all of the players on the left are better versions of the ones on the right. Let them become better players by playing them for the next 2 months
if king and tuck struggle to make an impact this week then we must make 2 more changes
in: connors out: tuck
in: casserley out: king
Makes a lot of sense.
Bet it doesn't happen............................No Balls exist off field at Punt Rd.
From Big Footy.
6 compulsory changes this week
in: reiwoldt out: polak
in: hughes out: bowden
in: morton out: pettifer
in: polo out: mcmahon
in: jackson out: tivendale
in: rance out: thursfield injured
all of the players on the left are better versions of the ones on the right. Let them become better players by playing them for the next 2 months
if king and tuck struggle to make an impact this week then we must make 2 more changes
in: connors out: tuck
in: casserley out: king
Makes a lot of sense.
Bet it doesn't happen............................No Balls exist off field at Punt Rd.
From Big Footy.
bloody oath Matts come on Momentai, and he's got plenty of improvement in him. At least he one of the few that will bust his gut. Thats priceless in this team.momentai said:
Rance and Thursfield are different types.
Rance is a Tall Defender that creates and likes to run at this stage better suited to a tall BP role eventually at CHB.
Thursty Will is more of a traditional stopper at FB / BP and not creative type as CHB have to be in modern footy.
Ideally going forward the Tigers need a 195 cm type Key Defender Full Back to allow Willy T to assume 3rd tall Back Pocket role and Rance as a future CHB that also runs and creates in the manner of a Bock, Chad Cornes (when at CHB) or Scarlett.
Rance is certainly more promising as a creative Tall key defender than McGuane and i believe he will usurp Lace Out before too long.
Rance is a Tall Defender that creates and likes to run at this stage better suited to a tall BP role eventually at CHB.
Thursty Will is more of a traditional stopper at FB / BP and not creative type as CHB have to be in modern footy.
Ideally going forward the Tigers need a 195 cm type Key Defender Full Back to allow Willy T to assume 3rd tall Back Pocket role and Rance as a future CHB that also runs and creates in the manner of a Bock, Chad Cornes (when at CHB) or Scarlett.
Rance is certainly more promising as a creative Tall key defender than McGuane and i believe he will usurp Lace Out before too long.
G
gold1
Guest
tigers#7 said:For the tenth time Schulz was playing on Jericho! It looked like McGuane was playing on him because he had to cover for bloody Schulz all the time. Anyway...........
Well from todays Coburg game........its obvious they're hungry to play senior footy, so the following changes should happen..........
IN: Rance Collins Polo Riewoldt Hughes Oakley-Nicholls Morton
OUT: Thursfield Tivendale Polak Schulz Pettifer Bowden McMahon
FB: McGuane Rance King
HB: Newman Moore Oakley-Nicholls
C: Polo Foley Richardson
HF: Morton Hughes Tambling
FF: Brown Riewoldt Edwards
R: Simmonds Cotchin Deledio
INT: Collins White Pattison Tuck
One could only hope :hmm At least *smile* is having a go.He had 24 possessions,and I find it interesting that most Pres name him full forward,chf,full back,chb;coupled with the fact that he is polling well in our voting,is it any wonder the guy might be getting a little confused.Leave him alone!There are plenty of others in this side to pick on for crap performances.
http://www.afl.com.au/Results/tabid/11433/default.aspx?seasonid=66&roundid=683&fixtureid=4907&display=3
Stats Richmond v Crows
Stats Richmond v Crows
keepa lids onit said:
Question: I agree with Tivs to be dropped, but here is my question: How bad is Wallace to allow his game plan (the only he has) to be continued even though, the game was changing?
By this I mean, Tivs was under instruction to hand pass the ball, when his strength was to run and carry and kick long. The same can be said about Lids, twice he hand passed in the backline, when the best option was to kick it long. When he did, he goaled!
I believe, Terry has to go. Four years, we seen some good football, but the other coaches wake up to his plan and have plan B,C & D. We have nothing.
They allowed us to go in the back pockets, but in the middle, they were there waiting for us and did they do a good job.
Our biggest problem has been the backline (getting the ball from backline into our forward line). How come other teams are able to continue to deliver the ball constantly and we struggle?
The other thing, why don't we provide an additional ruckman? We have no tap ruckman and get crushed week on week? Troy is a great around the ground ruckman, but he can't direct the ball to our guys. Patto tries hards and puts his body in, but again no tap ruckman.
Why didn't he moved Polak and *smile* around? Make his move too late.
Players, Bowden, Pettifer, Tivs, Hyde, *smile* and Jackson must go. Since I joined PRE, I'm been positive, but Saturday's was a low blow. I'm sick of being teased by Richmond.
Show some guts, Tigers. Trade or p$#% them off.
As for Wallace, only now have I realised that the game has passed him. We need someone who can clear the deadwood and make a real good start. We have fixed our finances and administration.
Get a good ruckman and an extra hard midfielder for next year. Do it, we must get results soon, otherwise, people like me (five membership) will not renew next year.
I went to see my daughter's soccer game today, they loss four to two, but they continue to attack and never gave up. This was a far better sport to view than the rubbish yesterday.
11 or 12 games to go, do something otherwise, you have lost me for good.
I doubt very much Melbourne will get close to Richmond next week.
Melbourne are without a defense or forward line...
Will be an interesting match though... I wonder what sort of crowd it will get at the Dome?
Melbourne are without a defense or forward line...
Will be an interesting match though... I wonder what sort of crowd it will get at the Dome?
G
gold1
Guest
I don't think we can plan effectively until Melbourne play tomorrow. In any case, I think if the demons can stay close until half time, it will be anyone's game, our second half efforts have not been great.
Jukes Extended said:
Pretty much agree Jukes, but I would consider giving Rance a run with Thirsty out. Bowdo will probably be forced back in Thirsty's absence. Pettifer would be out for mine as well. Soft as butter when the heat is turned up.
tha8ball said:
Not bad eighty. May include Rance as well. As you say Richo, Simmo and Brown are the only senior players that can hold their head up. Simmo is obviously injured and can't jump, but as we have no other ruck stocks we are in trouble here also.
momentai said:
You must be kidding "out Richo". He is having a fantastic year and should not/will not be dropped! He's one of the last you would drop. Agree with Tiva, Pettifer, McMahon and you could throw in Tuck, Polak and McGuanne. Would you really prefer Polak over Richo??? Wake up Momentai.
GoodOne said:
There first 2 goals were shockers, there was also one chase down on the wing by Brown where the dropped the ball, not paid which resulted in goals. I agree the umpires were woeful yesterday and the soft *smile* commentator need to start making a stand on it not bowing down the the AFL as they usually do.
We got a shocking run of decisions yesteday. It didn't cost us the game, but it changed the momentum at times.
In the Blood said:
Did you read the post?
he was not saying to 'drop' Richo but rather Rest him as he has been having troubles with his knee!!
OUT What id like - Tivendale, Pettifer, McGuane, McMahon and Thursty.
IN What id like- Collins, Morton, Rance, Riewoldt , and Polo however ive a sneaky suspicion Jon may get a run next week to be honest.
Connors seems to not have fitness required, Hyde should be stamped, and I think the likes of Polak, and Schulz are gonna be put on notice.
I cant see too many wholesale changes in fact i reckon there will be 4 at most.
McMuffin wont be dropped, neither will Tuck or Bowden.
Personally cant see Riewoldt and Cleever being called in together.
Rance and Collins for debut against the Dees cos they are the best side for the boys to debut against they have no monsters.
IN What id like- Collins, Morton, Rance, Riewoldt , and Polo however ive a sneaky suspicion Jon may get a run next week to be honest.
Connors seems to not have fitness required, Hyde should be stamped, and I think the likes of Polak, and Schulz are gonna be put on notice.
I cant see too many wholesale changes in fact i reckon there will be 4 at most.
McMuffin wont be dropped, neither will Tuck or Bowden.
Personally cant see Riewoldt and Cleever being called in together.
Rance and Collins for debut against the Dees cos they are the best side for the boys to debut against they have no monsters.