Where did I say it was a bad deal?perhaps you can enlighten me, and others, why the it is a bad deal for Victoria, and Australia, and assuming you think we should scrap the deal, what other trade we should and shouldnt be doing with China?
and my posting about Luke McGuane was always quality.
And the minute the Gov speaks out for an inquiry that will need Chinas cooperation as a signatory of the WHOin relation to Covid the Gov is suddenly doing the wrong thing diplomatically.China doesn't do anything for mutual benefit, that is clear. It's always a win-lose proposition for them.
Get out of default left wing mode sometimes?
The Fed labour gov't supported the libs legislation passed to allow them to tear up the Vic B&R agreement. Why?
Are you aware of the contents of all those other deals then? Neither am I.I have no thoughts on Dan's deal with China as I am not aware of the contents.
Are you suggesting we cut all ties with China? No exports, no diplomatic ties, no ties between universities etc? Yeah, good luck with that, too many of the Lib's mates making money out of links with China for that to happen.
If you want to criticise Dan for whatever he signed in relation to the Belt and Road Initiative and unsign that agreement, then you have to consider all the other agreements with China and also all the private sector links with China. Do you want to be consistent or just grandstand about one particular link with China for political point scoring?
Australia accepts more than 150 human rights recommendations made during the UN Human Rights Council's annual review in Geneva, but defends its border protection policies and does not back a call to phase out coal.www.google.com.au
China at it again.
How's the Covid investigation in China going?
We can't afford China to forge strong relationships with Indonesia.
One of Australia’s most senior diplomats has criticised foreign aid cuts in South-East Asia, saying the government needs to build its regional influence and stability.www.abc.net.au
After years n years of one child policy, where a large % of newborns were male, leaving an imbalance in the ratio of men to women. China has now changed it's mind n mandating a minimum of three kids per family. With a starting population of well over a billion people, they'll be over crowded n spreading out everywhere in another 3 or 4 generations. Make some room people.They're a going to breed more & more true believers.
"An editorial in a Chinese state-run news website has suggested Communist party members are obliged to have three children for the good of the country, as Beijing seeks to address plummeting birthrates."
We'll be ok, we'll be just about due to get our new submarines by then.After years n years of one child policy, where a large % of newborns were male, leaving an imbalance in the ratio of men to women. China has now changed it's mind n mandating a minimum of three kids per family. With a starting population of well over a billion people, they'll be over crowded n spreading out everywhere in another 3 or 4 generations. Make some room people.