Brodders17 said:Carlton vs Richmond
10 Cotchin (Rich)
6 Gibbs (Carl)
4 Jackson (Rich)
4 Tuck (Rich)
2 Vickery (Rich)
2 Walker (Carl)
1 Deledio (Rich)
1 Judd (Carl)
rosy3/23 said:I guess we don't know the roles players have out there or how well they performed a specific task. I respect the coaches to have a far more informed opinion than I would but I'd really like to know why Lids didn't rate higher.
Punxsutawney Phil said:Possibly because he went missing in the last quarter and hardly touched it.
rosy3/23 said:Maybe but he had a lot to do with us having such a good lead. There's more to a game than the last quarter. Lids kicked inspirational goals. His run, bounce and goal from outside 50 was Knighteresque. He made almost every possession count. I didn't think there was such a gulf between him and Cotch taking into account Cotch's 48% effectiveness and several clangers...and not always under pressure I reckon they were both great. I'd like to know why the coaches saw such a difference in the 2 performances.
Edit- You've lectured me a fair bit on Jacko's role Leysy. What was it this week and how do you think he performed it?
Punxsutawney Phil said:As a leader we needed him (along with many others) to step up to stop the Blues charge and unfortunately he didn't.
Leysy Days said:Thought he played well actually. One of his best games as a tiger, credit where it is due.
rosy3/23 said:Yep but what was his actual role and why do you think the coaches rated him so highly? I don't profess to know it but you've chosen to question and lecture me on it in the past so I'd like to know how you saw it.