craig said:Clarke shouldnt be going either.
No & NoBrodders17 said:his average of 55 with a strike rate of 80 in 2010 not enough?
his average of 71 with a strike rate of 80 over his last 10 innings not enough?
mb64 said:No & No
Brodders17 said:so S Marsh, who averaged 31, with a strike rate of 71 certainly wont be in the team.
i assume his averages are good enough. what kind of strike rate does he need?
evo said:20/20 is an insult to cricket.
Brodders17 said:his average of 55 with a strike rate of 80 in 2010 not enough?
his average of 71 with a strike rate of 80 over his last 10 innings not enough?
evo said:No way. 20/20 is an insult to cricket.
Happy to take Marsh,don't want Clarke.Brodders17 said:so S Marsh, who averaged 31, with a strike rate of 71 certainly wont be in the team.
i assume his averages are good enough. what kind of strike rate does he need?
Baseball?mk33 said:it should not even be called cricket, its just slogging with limited cricket strokes played at least in 50 over game you may see a cover drive.
It gets support from me. Kim Hughes captained Australia in the last test match I watched live. Boring as watching paint dry imo . The only cricket i have watched this summer is the KFC big bash and the one International 20/20. 3 hours is a good attention span for cricket I reckon.mb64 said:Test cricket is still the best but l love watching a good game of 20/20,not much support on pre for 20/20 it seems.
Like your opinion Navy BoyNavy Days said:Agree MB, Test cricket is definately king.
But give navy 20/20 over watching Gossip Girl or Greys Anatomy with the Mrs Navy anyday.
The Big Bash has a bit riding on it which backed by good commentary makes in decent viewing.
mb64 said:Great to see the selectors sticking with the youthful Lee & Tait for tonight's big bash.