All 3 results well & truly possible come tea on the last day.
Ah test cricket. Dont ya love it.
Ah test cricket. Dont ya love it.
Leysy Days said:All 3 results well & truly possible come tea on the last day.
Tigers of Old said:85 runs in 15 overs would seem highly unlikely.
TigerForce said:Where's Dave Warner........
Tigers of Old said:85 runs in 15 overs would seem highly unlikely.
Tigers of Old said:85 runs in 15 overs would seem highly unlikely.
Tigers of Old said:85 runs in 15 overs would seem highly unlikely.
jb03 said:Why only 15 overs?
If that is the case surprised we haven't had a bigger crack at getting runs quicker.
Streak said:Why only 15 overs ???
Do you mean minimum 30?
Tigers of Old said:85 runs in 15 overs would seem highly unlikely.
TigerForce said:I'm talking about the rule itself.
Wasn't it still 'not out' if the batsman showed intention to hit the ball but missed?
Leysy Days said:Now most umpires would let it go on a touch more if a result is imminent. But Billy Bowden would love the chance to get involved so they wont.
Joe Lynn Turnip said:SA's last wicket stand biting us in the arse now much? :-X
Leysy Days said:Leysy's done some investigating.
Play has stopped between 2am & 2.15am every night this far.
By leysy's reckoning we'll have get circa 20 more overs in.
Now most umpires would let it go on a touch more if a result is imminent. But Billy Bowden would love the chance to get involved so they wont.
Leysy Days said:Leysy's done some investigating.
Play has stopped between 2am & 2.15am every night this far.
By leysy's reckoning we'll have get circa 20 more overs in.
Now most umpires would let it go on a touch more if a result is imminent. But Billy Bowden would love the chance to get involved so they wont.
23.21.159 said:Playing a shot saves you only if you were struck outside the line of off stump:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lbw