Don't think quiney is up to it and isn't marsh only 27?Brodders17 said:im curious as to why a 29yo Quiney is excluded whilst 29yos Marsh and Cowan are listed as those who should be given a go?
Don't think quiney is up to it and isn't marsh only 27?Brodders17 said:im curious as to why a 29yo Quiney is excluded whilst 29yos Marsh and Cowan are listed as those who should be given a go?
Joe Lynn Turnip said:The allure of AFL is why NSW dominates the national team more than Victoria - yeah right. :One us is kidding themselves and it ain't me. Having spent roughly half my life in Victoria and the other half in NSW I'm at least familiar with both states and not just making biased assumptions about states or a football codes I know little about. It's not a p!ssing contest, it's just a fact NSW has a larger population to choose from, doesn't mean they're some kind of superior race. Same reason we don't win as many Olympic gold medals as China. There's no shame in it.
Would you bring Katich back then who would be a superior opener to Hughes. And do yo uthink Wade deserves a go, even as a batsmen?Leysy Days said:We need to regenerate by picking the best teams but also with a consideration for the future. Ridiculous to suggest as you do that all experienced players should be marched off so that young players coming dont have the experience of some of our greats to fall back on.
Leysy Days said:This is where a lot of primarily football followers get on the wrong track with a sport that is completely different. Test cruicket is unique. There are no premierships, no draft picks for losing games with young teams. This is the Australian Test Cricket team, baggy greens cannot be handed out on a whim. All tests have meaning with some more than others aka the Ashes, Series against India are huge as are any series against South Africa.
We need to regenerate by picking the best teams but also with a consideration for the future. Ridiculous to suggest as you do that all experienced players should be marched off so that young players coming dont have the experience of some of our greats to fall back on.
Streak said:End the opening farce, bring back Katich.
Forget technique, Hughes doesn't have the temprament for test cricket at the moment.
jb03 said:Use the rolly eyes smiley all you want, doesn't make you any smarter and more knowledgeable. You are simply refusing to accept that a one reason why NSW turns out more test cricketers than Victoria is that many talented kids in Victoria choose AFL over cricket - I have never said it is the sole reason. A larger population is another reason. Not sure why you can't accept this. And I don't particularly care where you have lived.
Brodders17 said:it seems a guy who should know a bit about cricker disagrees with you streaker.
ross taylor, NZ skipper, reckons Hughes should stay in the team, for the next test at least:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia-v-new-zealand-2011/content/current/story/543674.html
Taylor's comments are a less than subtle dig at Hughes' technique and if Hughes has any ticker he will be very fired up for the 2nd test after reading them. I suspect he has ticker but sadly for him he doesn't have the technique.Streak said:didn't read the article, but you don't think he has a vested interest do you Brodders :hihi
Sintiger said:Can Shaun Marsh open the batting ?
Sintiger said:Taylor's comments are a less than subtle dig at Hughes' technique and if Hughes has any ticker he will be very fired up for the 2nd test after reading them. I suspect he has ticker but sadly for him he doesn't have the technique.
Can Shaun Marsh open the batting ?
Streak said:We need to move away from the idea of putting in makesh!t openers. I still say put Katich back in there, and seriously try to find his replacement.
Wrong taylor Phantom. The comments were by Ross Taylor the Kiwi captain .Phantom said:Funny you should say that.
As I recall, Katich, in a way, was a makeshift opener.
He began as a middle order batsman then evolved into an opening batsman.
There have been plenty of them.
In my lifetime, Goddard, Barlow, Redpath, Gooch, Boon, Watson come quickly to mind.
Goddard, Barlow & Watson are examples of all-rounders who regularly opened the batting.
On Hughes, I posted on here that Hughes was debuted as an Test opening bat far too young.
He hadn't been given enough time to develop at a Shield level.
Taylor's comments are interesting.
He is still my favourite batsman & captain.
Taylor, himself, was pushed up as a 20 yo to open Australia's batting.
However, the then selectors made him wait in the Shield for about 4 years before letting him debut.
Of course, Taylor was an instant success on the 1989 English Tour that won back the Ashes.
As I thought then, Hughes has been pushed up too early before developing properly at Shield level.
Phantom said:Funny you should say that.
As I recall, Katich, in a way, was a makeshift opener.
He began as a middle order batsman then evolved into an opening batsman.
There have been plenty of them.
In my lifetime, Goddard, Barlow, Redpath, Gooch, Boon, Watson come quickly to mind.
Goddard, Barlow & Watson are examples of all-rounders who regularly opened the batting.
On Hughes, I posted on here that Hughes was debuted as an Test opening bat far too young.
He hadn't been given enough time to develop at a Shield level.
Taylor's comments are interesting.
He is still my favourite batsman & captain.
Taylor, himself, was pushed up as a 20 yo to open Australia's batting.
However, the then selectors made him wait in the Shield for about 4 years before letting him debut.
Of course, Taylor was an instant success on the 1989 English Tour that won back the Ashes.
As I thought then, Hughes has been pushed up too early before developing properly at Shield level.
Sintiger said:Wrong taylor Phantom. The comments were by Ross Taylor the Kiwi captain .
Brodders17 said:One change for the 2nd test.
Out: Cutting (inj)
In: Christian
Punxsutawney Phil said:Is he a batsman who bowls a bit or a bowler of bats a bit. His first class averages with both bat and ball aren't great.
So if he plays, does he replace a bowler or "Nick" Hughes?
jb03 said:Would you bring Katich back then who would be a superior opener to Hughes. And do yo uthink Wade deserves a go, even as a batsmen?
Streak said:We need to move away from the idea of putting in makesh!t openers. I still say put Katich back in there, and seriously try to find his replacement.
I think Marsh should be given a few years at 5 before moving up the order.
Leysy Days said:As others have noted players can move up to the opening position with success. Watson, Langer & Katich are examples.
You need a rock solid technique, be tough mentally, have patience & importantly an ability to consistently leave the ball. Marsh has most (not all) of these things ticked off so could make a real fist of it ILO.