Yeah I'm also surprised at the negative response received about this statistical overview...
Statistics can be a great tool, they help you analyze historical trends that allow the determination of areas to improve on.
However I do agree, statistics can be misleading, but they are only so when being used in the wrong way. Statistics should always be used in comparison to another statistic.
What I mean, is say for example, a team over a season has the least amount of goals/points scored against them. Some would say 'wow, they are the best defensive side in the comp'. However, in reality, they may be a slow tempo team and don't score much themselves... so the statistic in itself is misleading. A better way to see which team has the best defensive side would be to compare inside 50's against to scoring shots against. The team with the highest amount of inside 50's to lowest scoring shots against would be a better indication of a team's defensive ability.
Then again, i'm sure someone else would have a better idea of calculating a team's defensive ability.
That said, I do like the OP's post. But it would be nice to see from the stat recorder's, what is classed as a critical error.
But in an overall sense, it does show in a general sense, who uses the ball well. Good to see Deledio down there as the best on the list.
Statistics can be a great tool, they help you analyze historical trends that allow the determination of areas to improve on.
However I do agree, statistics can be misleading, but they are only so when being used in the wrong way. Statistics should always be used in comparison to another statistic.
What I mean, is say for example, a team over a season has the least amount of goals/points scored against them. Some would say 'wow, they are the best defensive side in the comp'. However, in reality, they may be a slow tempo team and don't score much themselves... so the statistic in itself is misleading. A better way to see which team has the best defensive side would be to compare inside 50's against to scoring shots against. The team with the highest amount of inside 50's to lowest scoring shots against would be a better indication of a team's defensive ability.
Then again, i'm sure someone else would have a better idea of calculating a team's defensive ability.
That said, I do like the OP's post. But it would be nice to see from the stat recorder's, what is classed as a critical error.
But in an overall sense, it does show in a general sense, who uses the ball well. Good to see Deledio down there as the best on the list.