Tames said:Does anyone think any club would be poaching Damien as their head coach?
no
Tames said:Does anyone think any club would be poaching Damien as their head coach?
You do make some good points and you're on the money with some of them. I do think he's occasionally shown that he can switch things up, the moves don't necessarily work (Rance to the midfield late against North and early against the Pies for instance), but at least he tried them. He also was the one who stuck with the idea of playing Jake King as a forward when he'd been previously played as a small defender, the same move didn't work with Morris. They are indications that he can sometimes think out of the box. He's switched game plans depending on the opposition at times as well, we saw this a few times last year. The early blitz against Freo stands out, no one saw that coming, least of all Fremantle. Some of what he does depends on personnel.17 said:All fair comment.
However, Hardwick never has been a risk taker, and probably never will be.
He is a process robot who flinches every time he strays out of his game plan straight-jacket, because his coaching instincts for team selection and intra game moves are poor and generally don't come off.
I too want a coach that takes risks, but unless Dimma travelled the road to Damascus in the off season, he ain't that guy.
Given this has been the case for most of his tenure, it's unlikely to change now that he is in the last year of contract.
But there is always that faint glimmer of off-season fools gold hope that, perversely, being in his last year might actually increase his risk taking in team selection and intra game moves.
He could maybe play fit players in form over "experienced" favourites that hardly trouble the statisticians (the number of which have thankfully diminished through retirement).
He could blood more youngsters and give them the experience they need whilst injecting the side with some pace and flair.
He could actually throw off the straight jacket and get on the offensive.
But that could be just off-season fools gold optimism.
Carter said:sorry it offends you :hihi
CarnTheTiges said:You do make some good points and you're on the money with some of them. I do think he's occasionally shown that he can switch things up, the moves don't necessarily work (Rance to the midfield late against North and early against the Pies for instance), but at least he tried them. He also was the one who stuck with the idea of playing Jake King as a forward when he'd been previously played as a small defender, the same move didn't work with Morris. They are indications that he can sometimes think out of the box. He's switched game plans depending on the opposition at times as well, we saw this a few times last year. The early blitz against Freo stands out, no one saw that coming, least of all Fremantle. Some of what he does depends on personnel.
The drafting this year did show that there's a change in the thinking. We drafted for speed and excitement. The guys we picked up were more speculative, outside the solid citizen type we've been selecting in the past. Only seeing what is done in the H&A will tell, but I hope the wheel is turning a little and we'll see some more unpredictable football from the team and the coach. Unpredictable teams are very hard to match up on. Sheedy's habit of playing guys in what seemed odd positions often threw the opposition's plans into disarray and Dimma did play most of his football under Kevin Sheedy, so he must have learned a few tricks from him, as would have Mark Williams.
CarnTheTiges said:You do make some good points and you're on the money with some of them. I do think he's occasionally shown that he can switch things up, the moves don't necessarily work (Rance to the midfield late against North and early against the Pies for instance), but at least he tried them.
The comment about Danielle (his wife) was made on On The Couch, she apparently called him an idiot for trying it in the first place. He did it during the North match, because we were getting flogged and had nothing to lose. He then repeated it at the start of the Collingwood game, but soon moved Rance back where he belongs when it became obvious that the backline were missing him.DLR said:Not sure why, but I seem to recall the suggestion coming from Dimma's wife - that was offered up by him as a bit of a throw away line in a post match interview iirc. (or was that a Wallace comment on something in his past)
bollocks the butt stops with the coach he has had 6 years to build a list and if the players are not up to it then it is 100 PERCENT THE COACHES FAULT PERIODMappa said:I agree with your comment, the coach always cops it in the throat.
But there are a number that need to improve not just the coach.
caesar said:I blame Captain Cotchin 9 kicks, Edwards & Brandon Ellis no shows in final against North for not taking the next step not the coach. So you may as well get rid of them then. You can only drag a horse to water!
The buck stops with the coach, but he might feel like he's getting it in the butt if our season collapses. Would have thought it's the recruiting depts. fault if the players aren't up to it. Francis n Blair are the ones that pick the draftees n trade players, all the coach does is set a type of player that best fits coaching / game styles.houdini said:bollocks the butt stops with the coach he has had 6 years to build a list and if the players are not up to it then it is 100 PERCENT THE COACHES FAULT PERIOD
TigerMasochist said:The buck stops with the coach, but he might feel like he's getting it in the butt if our season collapses. Would have thought it's the recruiting depts. fault if the players aren't up to it. Francis n Blair are the ones that pick the draftees n trade players, all the coach does is set a type of player that best fits coaching / game styles.
Dimma will be the one with the proverbials on the line all season, because he's the coach. If our season does go pear shaped then it will be time for a massive review n rejig of all aspects of the club, not just Dimma. Recruiting, trading, coaching n management should all be under the pump as the whole football agenda the club has set up over the last seven years would be seen to be inadequate for ultimate success.
And now reported on AFL website too but no mention of length/years? Prompted by Norf's extension of Scott. Looks like he doesn't have RFC backing if he is left suspended in 2016 and will cause a media frenzy. Little choice but to act, such a bad look.Tiger Ghost said:According to the HS will have his contract extended before round 1