-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Damien Hardwick [Merged]
- Thread starter Rosy
- Start date
- Status
tigertim said:
Your not suggesting he is the immaculate conception?
Maybe thats why he won't play McJesus?
Philip Yorke, 1st Earl of Hardwicke
Influence
n 1736 the King's Bench, under his presidency, delivered the seminal judgment in Middleton v. Crofts 2 Atk 650, which held that canons made in the provincial clergy convocations could not, by themselves, bind the lay faithful. He held the office of lord chancellor longer than any of his predecessors, with a single exception. His decisions fixed limits and established principles of Equity. His influence was powerful in obliterating the traditions of the judicial bench under the Stuart monarchy, and in establishing the modern conception of the duties and demeanour of English judges. While still at the bar Lord Chesterfield praised his conduct of crown prosecutions as a contrast to the former bloodhounds of the crown; and he described Sir Philip Yorke as naturally humane, moderate and decent.
Influence
n 1736 the King's Bench, under his presidency, delivered the seminal judgment in Middleton v. Crofts 2 Atk 650, which held that canons made in the provincial clergy convocations could not, by themselves, bind the lay faithful. He held the office of lord chancellor longer than any of his predecessors, with a single exception. His decisions fixed limits and established principles of Equity. His influence was powerful in obliterating the traditions of the judicial bench under the Stuart monarchy, and in establishing the modern conception of the duties and demeanour of English judges. While still at the bar Lord Chesterfield praised his conduct of crown prosecutions as a contrast to the former bloodhounds of the crown; and he described Sir Philip Yorke as naturally humane, moderate and decent.
plus Newyspook said:Ben Cousins 253 17
Troy Simmons 190 7
Graham Polak 108 3
Richard Tambling 95 13
Kelvin Moore 65 22
Luke McGuane 54 51
Will Thursfield 53 24
Dean Polo 52 4
Mitch Morton 50 21
Adam Thomson 30 2
Tom Hislop 19 8
Angus Graham 18 30
Daniel Connors 10 19
Andrew Collins 10 15
Jayden Post 7 23
Mitchell Farmer 3 28
Andrew Browne 1 11
Matt Dea 0 31
Troy Taylor 0 4
Jeromey Webberley 0 16
Ben Nason 0 23
Alroy Gilligan 0 0
David Gourdis 0 4
Jamie O’Reilly 0 4
Robert Hicks 0 3
Pat Contin 0 0
Relton Roberts 0 2
Nick Westhoff 0 0
antman said:
Lets not get silly.
2012Port Adelaide 22 5 16 1 1691 2144 78.87 22
2013Port Adelaide 22 12 10 0 2051 2002 102.45 48 plus a finals win
Richmond
2009 15 Richmond Tigers 22 5 16 1 25.00% 22 1774 2388 74.29%
2010 15 Richmond Tigers 22 6 16 0 27.27% 24 1714 2348 73.00%
lamb22 said:
2015 Port Adelaide 22 12 10 0 2002 1874 106.8 48
2015. Richmond 22 15 7 0 1930 1568 123.1 60
Sintiger said:
If we are talking rebuilds shouldn't you be comparing Hinkley's third year with Hardwick's third year or perhaps mentioning Hinkley won three finals games in his first two years of the rebuild and missed a GF spot by a whisker.
Also 12 wins not bad seeing Port played top 8 sides more than any other team.
BTW other than a few superstars including Wingard and Grey Port's list is pretty ordinary, especially back half and vastly inferior to ours.
lamb22 said:
True.
What really stands out like proverbials is that Hardwick is yet to coach a winning final in three attempts.
If Dan Richardson and Brendan Gale haven't clued in to Hardwicks deficiencies as a coach by now then this club is in trouble.
Talk of extending his contract is just absurd.
It will come back to bite those running the football dept in a big way.
And so it should.
Now now Lamby, let's not bring out the silly post argument hidden with an olive branch ;D . Whether we or Port had a worse list is opinion onlylamb22 said:
Comparisons with Hinkley and B Scott get trotted out and the facts are that based on home and away results Dimma compares pretty well against them, especially in the last 3 years. Then there is the issue of finals of course and that is the achilles heal of Dimma's record, no doubt. I am not denying it nor trying to argue against it. He and the team need to set that right for him to be considered a real success.
Dimma has managed to get us into the finals the last 3 years which is something Scott and Hinkley haven't done so that's a tick for him. Win a few finals and he definitely can lay claim to be their equal.
Not to mention that both Scott and Hinkley inherited lists that were in better shape than ours was when Hardwick first came in.Sintiger said:
- Status