Harry said:why didn't jackson go on watson?
Are you trying to say that piece of play was the worst or only bad piece of play by any of the Tiger players? If not, why are you binging it up - unless you just want to have something to bag Jackson for when he played well overall?IrockZ said:Did you see the play when Jackson had the ball in the middle of the ground and Cotch ran past? It was a clear handball to a running player, but no, Jackson went on his own and kicked an aimless ball to the forward pocket where it was marked by Essendon.
I don't think he is that dumb of a footy player, he just thinks he's better than he is.
Harry said:why didn't jackson go on watson?
Brodders17 said:i would guess because our preferred option is not go with tags, tho we do it sometimes. tags throw out our rotations and our defensive zoning.
FredH said:Are you trying to say that piece of play was the worst or only bad piece of play by any of the Tiger players? If not, why are you binging it up - unless you just want to have something to bag Jackson for when he played well overall?
Yeah, I would have pencilled him in for this role to start with. If it's not working, change it, but at least give it a go.Harry said:it worked last year when we beat the bombers and jackson beat watson
obvious move imo
Leysy Days said:Fair play. Was more than solid.
yes it was an example of you trying to find something to bag him about when he played really well. Are you going to be petty again and try to find something he didn't do so well from last night?IrockZ said:Just an example, this is the Jackson thread is it not? Was in the 3rd quarter I think when we had a little run on so it was a pretty important howler.