-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Daniel Jackson threads [Merged]
- Thread starter Rosy
- Start date
Re: Daniel Jackson
Gee Whiz. No recognition at all for blanketing Dangerfield in the second half. Went a long way to securing the win I thought. He has his limitations but you have to give him some credit surely.
Gee Whiz. No recognition at all for blanketing Dangerfield in the second half. Went a long way to securing the win I thought. He has his limitations but you have to give him some credit surely.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Made a couple of typical Jacko blues but overall was very good.
Dangerfield gave Grigg a bath in the first half. Jacko kept him to 11 after half-time. Anyway, Danger is almost untaggable. Star.
The positives of having Jacko in the team are he is a very good team player, super-hard at it, and always does the things we scream about, like tackling, chasing, shepherding and going when it's his turn.
Made a couple of typical Jacko blues but overall was very good.
Dangerfield gave Grigg a bath in the first half. Jacko kept him to 11 after half-time. Anyway, Danger is almost untaggable. Star.
The positives of having Jacko in the team are he is a very good team player, super-hard at it, and always does the things we scream about, like tackling, chasing, shepherding and going when it's his turn.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Clangerfield (where r u Tooheys & Disco) beat him hands down (as he did Rance, Grigg etc), no shame in that, the kids a champ.
Thought he was OK though, the odd bad clanger, which with his decision making & skillset he'll have, but was solid.
Clangerfield (where r u Tooheys & Disco) beat him hands down (as he did Rance, Grigg etc), no shame in that, the kids a champ.
Thought he was OK though, the odd bad clanger, which with his decision making & skillset he'll have, but was solid.
Re: Daniel Jackson
It seems it doesnt matter what this guy does on the field, the usuals will come out and and not give him credit for a solid performance on their best player today. By the way Jacko didnt go to Dangerfield until after half time. He was instrumental in shutting him down after half time.
It seems it doesnt matter what this guy does on the field, the usuals will come out and and not give him credit for a solid performance on their best player today. By the way Jacko didnt go to Dangerfield until after half time. He was instrumental in shutting him down after half time.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Good to see he has learnt the art of releasing a contested handball in a tackle. Took him 8 odd years. Still ducked into some tackles and tried to wrap it up and hope he wasn't pinged but released it free a few times which was surprising.
Good to see he has learnt the art of releasing a contested handball in a tackle. Took him 8 odd years. Still ducked into some tackles and tried to wrap it up and hope he wasn't pinged but released it free a few times which was surprising.
Re: Daniel Jackson
I reckon Jacko's actually improving. There were a couple of times today by hand, and once by foot when he found Grigg for his last quarter goal, where he showed poise, awareness and vision. He's dumb and a slow learner, but he's a student. And he never gives up.
Edit: Beat me to it Barnzy. A couple of excellent, ride the tackle, spin-to-the-right-spot-and-release handballs.
I reckon Jacko's actually improving. There were a couple of times today by hand, and once by foot when he found Grigg for his last quarter goal, where he showed poise, awareness and vision. He's dumb and a slow learner, but he's a student. And he never gives up.
Edit: Beat me to it Barnzy. A couple of excellent, ride the tackle, spin-to-the-right-spot-and-release handballs.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Probably looking at a different aspect to his game today then some of you guys.. He was sent in to stop a rampaging Dangerfield and done that to a tee. Maybe some of his general play was sloppy but his main role was carried out which helped the tigers get a win today.
Probably looking at a different aspect to his game today then some of you guys.. He was sent in to stop a rampaging Dangerfield and done that to a tee. Maybe some of his general play was sloppy but his main role was carried out which helped the tigers get a win today.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Not sure about all this shutting Dangerfield down stuff, he was one of the best players on the ground after half-time.
Not sure about all this shutting Dangerfield down stuff, he was one of the best players on the ground after half-time.
Re: Daniel Jackson
In fairness if kept Dangerfield to being anything less that BOG today we were probably going to win. Jackson did that in the second half.
Leysy Days said:
In fairness if kept Dangerfield to being anything less that BOG today we were probably going to win. Jackson did that in the second half.
Re: Daniel Jackson
If he was in Richmond colours he probably gets BOG. But yes, agreed valid point Big Col.
As Col was replying to leysy assume thats directed towards him. If you could point out the hate that would be appreciated. Cheers.
Col.W.Kurtz said:
If he was in Richmond colours he probably gets BOG. But yes, agreed valid point Big Col.
Tigersub said:
As Col was replying to leysy assume thats directed towards him. If you could point out the hate that would be appreciated. Cheers.
Re: Daniel Jackson
I thought Jacko did a good job stopping Danger getting follow up possessions in the 2nd half which he got plenty of in the first half. It is virtually impossible to stop Danger getting that first touch but I thought he tracked him well as the play contined and put body pressure on him so Danger's became single efforts which helped curb his influence in comparison to the first half.
I thought Jacko did a good job stopping Danger getting follow up possessions in the 2nd half which he got plenty of in the first half. It is virtually impossible to stop Danger getting that first touch but I thought he tracked him well as the play contined and put body pressure on him so Danger's became single efforts which helped curb his influence in comparison to the first half.
