-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Daniel Jackson threads [Merged]
- Thread starter Rosy
- Start date
Re: Daniel Jackson
Was ok today, still undoes his good play with amateur brain fades. The centring kick was funny and then his handball with 4 crows around him was even funnier.
Needs to cut those parts out his game, it was ok today but against a real side it won't be funny.
Was ok today, still undoes his good play with amateur brain fades. The centring kick was funny and then his handball with 4 crows around him was even funnier.
Needs to cut those parts out his game, it was ok today but against a real side it won't be funny.
Re: Daniel Jackson
As always Jacko has the odd clanger, he's never going to be one of our elite polished stars. But he's given us a bloody honest game of footy again and hauled easily his share of the workload.
Haven't copped a look at the replay yet but, not sure it's fair to bag him for the dropped mark. Wrong end of the ground for my tired old eyes but I don't think the delivery was all that flash n Jacko wound up pretty much diving to try and make the mark.
As always Jacko has the odd clanger, he's never going to be one of our elite polished stars. But he's given us a bloody honest game of footy again and hauled easily his share of the workload.
Haven't copped a look at the replay yet but, not sure it's fair to bag him for the dropped mark. Wrong end of the ground for my tired old eyes but I don't think the delivery was all that flash n Jacko wound up pretty much diving to try and make the mark.
Re: Daniel Jackson
I dont mind Jacko, but I am bemused by his current trend of not taking the first option.
In the first half, there were a number of times when a skilled runner was easily the first and best option within handball distance, but Jacko tries to run a few more metres and kick it.
He has limitations and must play within them.
His second half was much better and certainly curbed Dangerfield's game while also being much better offensively himself.
I dont mind Jacko, but I am bemused by his current trend of not taking the first option.
In the first half, there were a number of times when a skilled runner was easily the first and best option within handball distance, but Jacko tries to run a few more metres and kick it.
He has limitations and must play within them.
His second half was much better and certainly curbed Dangerfield's game while also being much better offensively himself.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Dangerfield had 17 disposals in the first half, 88 supercoach points.
In the second half, he had 11 disposals, 62 supercoach points.
Jackson had 59 supercoach points in the second half.
So, Dangerfield had significantly less disposals and supercoach points in the second half. Jackson also nearly matched him with supercoach points in the second half.
To me, Jackon's effort was commendable given Dangerfield is a freak and had a fantastic confidence boosting first quarter.
Dangerfield had 17 disposals in the first half, 88 supercoach points.
In the second half, he had 11 disposals, 62 supercoach points.
Jackson had 59 supercoach points in the second half.
So, Dangerfield had significantly less disposals and supercoach points in the second half. Jackson also nearly matched him with supercoach points in the second half.
To me, Jackon's effort was commendable given Dangerfield is a freak and had a fantastic confidence boosting first quarter.
Re: Daniel Jackson
I doubt the coaching staff would use SC stats in the game review.
Is 62 sc points bad in a half? it's brilliant! his first half was crazy good though.
So Danger doesn't copy his 88 in the second half so he struggled? I think the rain contributed to his lack of influence.
I thought Jacko's game on the day was alright, but saying he slowed Danger's influence on the game is ridiculous.
I doubt the coaching staff would use SC stats in the game review.
Is 62 sc points bad in a half? it's brilliant! his first half was crazy good though.
So Danger doesn't copy his 88 in the second half so he struggled? I think the rain contributed to his lack of influence.
I thought Jacko's game on the day was alright, but saying he slowed Danger's influence on the game is ridiculous.
Re: Daniel Jackson
:hihi
I've said good things about some of Jacko's games this season..
Can't stand the bloke but I'll give him praise when I thinks he's done well....that goes for any player.
tigersnake said:
:hihi
I've said good things about some of Jacko's games this season..
Can't stand the bloke but I'll give him praise when I thinks he's done well....that goes for any player.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Dangerfield is a side issue IMO. Chimp or Lids should have gone to him. Each did for a bit. Jackson? Wha? He got done on the day. As did Lids for ten minutes.
Action has been a bit off for the past two weeks. We have six very important games coming up. If Action improves we make the four.
Kids, the bloke was not an AFL class footballer two or five years ago. I like duds who improve like Action Jackson. He is harsh and he runs both ways. A revelation in 2013.
Don't you love violence? No reports these days. Action hurts em. Harsh. Plays for Richmond.
Dangerfield is a side issue IMO. Chimp or Lids should have gone to him. Each did for a bit. Jackson? Wha? He got done on the day. As did Lids for ten minutes.
Action has been a bit off for the past two weeks. We have six very important games coming up. If Action improves we make the four.
Kids, the bloke was not an AFL class footballer two or five years ago. I like duds who improve like Action Jackson. He is harsh and he runs both ways. A revelation in 2013.
Don't you love violence? No reports these days. Action hurts em. Harsh. Plays for Richmond.
Re: Daniel Jackson
As much as I hate to say it, I think Danger is a little bit too much man for our thin hipped Lids, when he tried to tackle him in the third it didn't turn out well.
Jackson may be a much lessor player than danger, but isn't going to get done in the fat-arsed-power game. DJ's contribution was to get Paddy's net game from match winning to good.
Dyer'ere said:
As much as I hate to say it, I think Danger is a little bit too much man for our thin hipped Lids, when he tried to tackle him in the third it didn't turn out well.
Jackson may be a much lessor player than danger, but isn't going to get done in the fat-arsed-power game. DJ's contribution was to get Paddy's net game from match winning to good.
Re: Daniel Jackson
Dangerfield was a real problem until Jacko went to him in the second half and nullified his output enough to make it too big a task for the Crows to overcome us.
Dangerfield was a real problem until Jacko went to him in the second half and nullified his output enough to make it too big a task for the Crows to overcome us.
