-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Did the two "step back" points alter the result?
- Thread starter graystar1
- Start date
KnightersRevenge said:
Here here. We are the endangered species when it comes to frees. Foley did handball it and his composure to not chew the maggots ear off was commendable.
jb03 said:
very soft as was the 50 mtr penanlty against white on the wing which ended up being about a 90 meter penalty...end result goal to the dogs
very soft as was the 50 mtr penanlty against white on the wing which ended up being about a 90 meter penalty...end result goal to the dogs
That was a shocker alright. As was said in the paper this morning, something along the lines of buying land from that ump.
That was a shocker alright. As was said in the paper this morning, something along the lines of buying land from that ump.
Yes the two step back points cost us. Never give then anthing.
Free kicks did go against us for most of the game.
But what gets to me is how they change their minds on what a free is form 1st to the 2nd half.
Free kicks did go against us for most of the game.
But what gets to me is how they change their minds on what a free is form 1st to the 2nd half.
Would be surprised to hear how many holding the ball decisions there was ...
The umpires let so many go!
The umpires let so many go!
graystar1 said:
It was Polak and King who stepped through the goals in the dying stages.
I blame Wallace for the tempo footy that we played with about six minutes to go.
You could see the entire team slow it up & try to ice the clock so the call obviously came from the box.
It wasn't the wrong thing to do, it all just happend about 3 minutes too early.
The team and the coach will hopefully learn from that.
How about Simmonds kicking to our uncontested forward line while Richo and everyone else was back waiting for a kick behind play to milk the clock, which gave them the rebounding goal. All he had to do with 1.20sec on the clock was kick it short to a target not bomb it forward.
Yep, was the wrong option. the thing that did us was the sideways chipping across the Dogs goalmouth that resulted in king rushing it through. We just could not clear the area- there were just no options. As Wallace said, can't afford to chip it around that close to the opposition goal.Chocco said: