Did the VFA have it right? | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Did the VFA have it right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gold1
  • Start date Start date
G

gold1

Guest
I have thought for a long time that with the advent of flooding, more interchange players,that maybe the answer to a more fluent game is a 16,no wings side,with the same numbers as current on the interchange bench.Any thoughts?
 
Totally agree, gold1, the easiest and logical rule change to minimise flooding.

But IMO no more rule changes.

(Definitely no more interchange players.)
 
gold1 said:
I have thought for a long time that with the advent of flooding, more interchange players,that maybe the answer to a more fluent game is a 16,no wings side,with the same numbers as current on the interchange bench.Any thoughts?
Another threat to Richo's career, leave the game alone please