dont need fev, sarge to ff

[keepa lids onit]

IMHO, i believe the sarge can develop into our new ff over the coming years. im taking the line that tw has tried to introduce sarge into the chb posi to gain exposure and an understanding of the defensive side of things. thus when he goes to ff he will have some understanding of how his opposition players operate and use this to his advantage. i have a strong belief he can deliver.
heres hoping to see sarge given a fair crack at ff next year!!! :clap :clap

 

[goose]

Must develop into a CHB, not a FF. We have the personel to have a potent fwd line (barring injury) the back line is our most critical defeciency. Premeriship teams have great backlines.

 

[keepa lids onit]

agree there goose, we need KP backmen, but i dont think sarge is the answer. to me seems more suited to fwd line.

 

[TigerMasochist]

Have a look at Sarge's work in the hawthorn game last year, before and after he got injured. He will make a key forward with Richo up the ground. His attack on the ball and work to set up in the last quarter was excellent.

 

[Mr Brightside]

Sarge will have a superb 2006 where ever he plays ;D

 

[Tigers of Old]

If Sarge develops as I'm sure the club hopes, he'll be used at either end of the ground.

 

[Bill James]

Would have traded him for Watts if the chance was there.

Needs to get a work ethic to deserve a game let alone an allocated position.

Hope that comes with maturity in 2006, showed some signs in his last two outings.

 

[Tiger Endevour]

Should be played in the forward line where he belongs. Stuff this backline business - once again next year the same old same old hey - kick it to Richo business....