-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
After the completion of last nights bumbers v west coke game, it came to me that the bumbers have won thier last 3 games, by the influence of soft frees / incorrect desicions.
1. richmond - the richo free. was it legit? we can argue that forever.
2. sydney - having a player WELL over the boundary line, and no out of play called, thus resulting in a goal.
3. west coast - soft in the back free which was not payed earlier up the other end of the ground.
I hate to breed negativity but i have a swarm of Bombers fans gloating and swanning around as if they are the next big thing. Surely they are not blinded by thier success that much!! I am not the only one that has noticed these 3 telling factors in thier wins?! They tell me im just sour cause we are yet to notch a win, but i think i am just pointing out the bare facts. if the push in the back rule was not as hard line as it is, would they have won these games? i think not. (mayb sydney).
I'd like to know other pre's opinions on The Bombers, whether they are the 'real deal', or whether they are just pretenders. Plus then i have support to back me up against the arrogant mongrels. :boxing
1. richmond - the richo free. was it legit? we can argue that forever.
2. sydney - having a player WELL over the boundary line, and no out of play called, thus resulting in a goal.
3. west coast - soft in the back free which was not payed earlier up the other end of the ground.
I hate to breed negativity but i have a swarm of Bombers fans gloating and swanning around as if they are the next big thing. Surely they are not blinded by thier success that much!! I am not the only one that has noticed these 3 telling factors in thier wins?! They tell me im just sour cause we are yet to notch a win, but i think i am just pointing out the bare facts. if the push in the back rule was not as hard line as it is, would they have won these games? i think not. (mayb sydney).
I'd like to know other pre's opinions on The Bombers, whether they are the 'real deal', or whether they are just pretenders. Plus then i have support to back me up against the arrogant mongrels. :boxing