Fev faces sack | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Fev faces sack

Legends of 1980 said:
only caught a bit of it, but he said the players were supportive of him, he had just had lunch with voss, the administrators should administrate and the players and coaches should be left alone to play and coach.

Aker also said most players wers supportive of him. I wouldn't go on what Fevola says alone. Still think Fevola is the meat in the sandwich (hmm is that a pun) so to speak. I think the widening rift sits with Brisbane management and Voss. They are now realising the error of judgement in appointing Voss without any practical experience. And they are in financial trouble. At 30 yo now and with Brisbane moving to the bottom of their cycle I am sure the administration would love to somehow break the contract they have with Fevola. He's costing them almost $2mill over the next 2 years.
 
SCOOP said:
Anyone see Fev on the Before the game show?

The fev spoke really well, doesn't look like a man under pressure. And seemed to have the playing groups support, the players seem united, the players seem to be ok with Vossy but the gap between the people running the club and the players seems huge. Not good.
Lions would be the worst run club at the moment
 
Yep Queensland Police have announced there will be no charges against Fev in regard to this alleged incident.
 
Meanwhile at Brissie list management HQ...

425.fargo.101707.jpg
 
why does the shiela get off scot free? women have it to easy to bring people down these days. More accountability is needed. Maybe the women should get locked up or fabricating lies. tramps
 
Crumpet_Avenger said:
why does the shiela get off scot free? women have it to easy to bring people down these days. More accountability is needed. Maybe the women should get locked up or fabricating lies. tramps

Settle down.
Police said there wasn't enough evidence to charge, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Like most sexual assault type charges - a matter of she said, he said.
 
Crumpet_Avenger said:
why does the shiela get off scot free? women have it to easy to bring people down these days. More accountability is needed. Maybe the women should get locked up or fabricating lies. tramps

u r a tool.
 
Crumpet_Avenger said:
why does the shiela get off scot free? women have it to easy to bring people down these days. More accountability is needed. Maybe the women should get locked up or fabricating lies. tramps
Don't hold back or anything. Does the Tramp comment apply to all women or just the Shielas crying wolf over footballers pork swords?
 
Probably said it was hard to prove indecent exposure, seeing it was situated in its normal position, hanging off his head.
fev protested his innocence, given the above facts and he thought was a normal appendage position.
It doesn't in any way mean the poor woman wasn't distressed by such an encounter.





*spellcheck*
 
Crumpet_Avenger said:
why does the shiela get off scot free? women have it to easy to bring people down these days. More accountability is needed. Maybe the women should get locked up or fabricating lies. tramps

Do you know the full story? Doubt it.
 
The AFL are still thinking of charging Fev!

What a joke, the police decide that nothing is out of line but the AFL still want to hang Fev for something that has been cleared but they allow AFL players to leave the country while still under investigation for a much more serious charge!
 
News reports up here are saying that Police have halted the investigation into Fev indecently exposing himself due to insufficient evidence.............................

Think Fev might be stupid enough to appeal against that? ;)
 
Phar Ace said:
News reports up here are saying that Police have halted the investigation into Fev indecently exposing himself due to insufficient evidence.............................

Strewth - Fev must have a very small appendage - insufficient evidence?
 
SCOOP said:
The AFL are still thinking of charging Fev!

What a joke, the police decide that nothing is out of line but the AFL still want to hang Fev for something that has been cleared but they allow AFL players to leave the country while still under investigation for a much more serious charge!

I'd have thought the Ben Cousins situation would have provided grounds of precedence as to the AFLs behaviour in this case.
 
Streak said:
I'd have thought the Ben Cousins situation would have provided grounds of precedence as to the AFLs behaviour in this case.

I might be wrong but at the time Ben was deregistered by the AFL he had actually been charged by the police it was only after that the police dropped the charges.

The two situations are different.