TigerForce said:It was AMBIGUOUS from what I heard and read so far.
Trying to be a bit "cute", should have thumped it and left no doubtGypsy__Jazz said:Agree, MK. No use bleating about that decision... Foley probably did get a graze on it...but how can the ump pick that up?
Phantom said:Technically, Foley did handball just in front of himself, which every kid from junior footy on is told to do in the same situation. The ball was turning/spinning in the air which indicated that he had handballed. Technically it was play on.
Point was that Foley's handball was so gentle it didn't look like one and the umpire deemed it improper disposal.
Those are the breaks.
Foley will learn that it's not enough just to be handballing but to be SEEN as handballing.
Whats with the 50m penalties, why did they only pay them early in the match? Players still ran through over the mark later in the game. It seems like the umps are under instructions to be tough early in the game!Tigers of Old said:Believe it or not Tim Watson made a good point today about 50m penalties being too tough for slightly running over the mark. A good example of how once you introduce a new rule it becomes distorted as to why it was introduced in the first place, hence my abhorrence at the into of any send off rule.