Gaspar threads (merged) | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Gaspar threads (merged)

Re: Gas

We lack versatility.  We have too many players who are 1 dimensional - Gas, Chubba, Rayzor, Tivva, Cogs, Richo, Pets, - geez I could name most of the team.  Good teams have players who can swap roles.  Players such as Brad Johnson who can play back/forward/middle.

When we are on top our 1 dimensional players look like super stars but when we're on the belting end they can't change gears or game plan.

All of which is very sad for blokes like Gas.
 
Re: Gas

poppa x said:
We lack versatility.  We have too many players who are 1 dimensional - Gas, Chubba, Rayzor, Tivva, Cogs, Richo, Pets, - geez I could name most of the team.  Good teams have players who can swap roles.  Players such as Brad Johnson who can play back/forward/middle.

When we are on top our 1 dimensional players look like super stars but when we're on the belting end they can't change gears or game plan.

All of which is very sad for blokes like Gas.

It's a good word versatility, once you can have that structured deep into a team, you know you are going places.

Unfortunately, not much of it around at Tigerland.
 
Re: Gas

Got to agree with a couple of others, Bob is spot on. Although I have immense respect for TW if in fact he did tell Bob that the Tigers were 4 years behind the Dogs and it doesn't sound too far fetched, why didn't he tell us the supporters the same thing? I know people don't want to hear it, but we also don't want to be lied to and then watch a game with some hope only to have it completely smashed out of us.
 
Re: Gas

nitrotiger said:
Rosy,the doggies had 12 different goalkickers.......a tad difficult for 1 key backman to cover.The doggies were kicking goals from EVERYWHERE.
That makes the knockers of gaspar appear to be  even bigger *smile*s....... :-X

i would bag about another 15 players before i bag gas.
 
Re: Gas

Wallace said Gas' possessions shouldn't be the basis for criticism, as he was more worried about stopping blokes than trying to rebound. Finger in the dyke type situation, but the dyke was a broken dam.

Personally, swap Hall and Schulz around Phato and I'd be sold.
 
Re: Gas

again we get on the bandwagon of bagging the defence for the pathetic, inept "performance" of our midfield. You could have 10 Dustin Fletchers, 10 Silvagnis, 10 Mews etc etc & it wouldn't have mattered on Friday night due to the ease with which the pill came out of the middle. The footy was going inside out defensive 50 more often than bombs dropped into Baghdad during Operation Shock & Awe! When our defenders DID get the ball in defence & were looking to run it out, they would look up the ground & see nothing but mannequins with Richmond jumpers on planted out on the ground. Our mids & fwds were absolute BLUDGERS on Friday night & contributed heavily to our smashing. >:(
 
Re: Gas

God help you all from the WRATH OF ANDURIL!!!! :help

Even i am smart enough not to get on here and assassinate him for fear of retribution fron Andy 8)
 
Re: Gas

zips said:
again we get on the bandwagon of bagging the defence for the pathetic, inept "performance" of our midfield.  You could have 10 Dustin Fletchers, 10 Silvagnis, 10 Mews etc etc & it wouldn't have mattered on Friday night due to the ease with which the pill came out of the middle.  The footy was going inside out defensive 50 more often than bombs dropped into Baghdad during Operation Shock & Awe!  When our defenders DID get the ball in defence & were looking to run it out, they would look up the ground & see nothing but mannequins with Richmond jumpers on planted out on the ground.  Our mids & fwds were absolute BLUDGERS on Friday night & contributed heavily to our smashing.   >:(

I think you miss the point.

Half our problem is that we never properly rebound from defence in the first place. So it comes back just as quickly.
 
Re: Gas

Phantom said:
Interesting that Gas should come up.

I could be wrong, but I thought he played on Morgan. Morgan is a rangy kid, about 6.4, with about 4 or 5 years in the system and is just finding his feet. Gas battled it out with the kid, and I think the kid, Morgan, ended up with 3 goals.

I was talking with Bob, Footscrays scout of about 25 years, at Bx Hill today during the TAC double header. He reckons players like Gaspar & Kellaway aren't any chop at all, and should get the chop ASAP.

His argument is that players like Gaspar & Kellaway are too one dimensional, provide no rebound at all, and whose disposal is neutral, ie doesn't hurt the opposition.

One of the keys, he thought & I agreed, was that the Bulldog defence rebounded effectively, providing options in the centre. We just kept on going further out onto the flanks. Our key defenders provided no options, when we were in possession, and gave no rebound at all.

Gaspar & Kellaway should be dropped immediately. Sculz can have a go at FB, Hall should return to CHB. He commended Raines & Newman for their efforts in defence. Bob also believes that Deledio can best serve Richmond, at present, on a hbf as an excellent disposer, creating options in defence, and accurately kicking on to midfielders who can do some damage.

Suggested defence:
B: Raines, Schulz & Thursfield (when he returns)
HB: Newman, Hall, Deledio

I know that many won't agree with me.
But my attitude is, that if you take the emotion out of it, you LISTEN to what those in the know from outside have to say, and take good advice.

PS: Bob said that Eade gave all the Doggie scouts simple instructions.

"Don't bring any boys to me who don't already have the skills necessary to play AFL footy. Give me well skilled boys that in 3 to 4 years I can turn into men."

Bob said that he spoke to "Plough" late last year. "Plough" said that the Tiges were 4 years behing the Doggies.

Bob said alot of other things, but they're not relevant to this thread.
has bob been reading my posts but hey lets not gfo there the ferals get to upset. :rofl
 
Re: Gas

Phantom said:
He reckons players like Gaspar & Kellaway aren't any chop at all, and should get the chop ASAP.

His argument is that players like Gaspar & Kellaway are too one dimensional, provide no rebound at all, and whose disposal is neutral, ie doesn't hurt the opposition.
Bob is right.
Been terrific servants of the club but the game has passed them by at a rapid pace. These two along with Chaffey are a part of our past. One dimensional, unskilled, slow, poor decision makers. The truth hurts.
Thanks but goodbye.
 
Re: Gas

Spot on Phantom with your defence, the only change id make is newman goes in the middle and hartigan & johnson come back tuck or cogs goe to hff and that leaves a midfield of Cogs/tuck + Newman + Raines (rotating with Lids)


Suggested defence:
B: Hartigan, Schulz & Thursfield (when he returns)
HB: Johnos/Raines, Hall, Deledio
 
Re: Gas

Phantom, agree with you and Bob.

Gaspar and Kellaway have battled hard over the years but they are now finished. Their disposal is a liability, especially on the Telstra Dome surface, and the pace has gone - bring them out for a windy MCG only!

Most disappointing is the obvious lack of leadership, enthusiasm, aggression, ANYTHING, especially from Gaspar. Football looks like torture to this bloke. I think he'd rather go to the dentist.

At 30 years of age, with over 10 years experience in senior footy, it is just not good enough to be introverted on the field.

Looking forward to the match committee making a stand with both these blokes spending time at Coburg - we desperately need the next generation coming through.
 
Re: Gas

Hungry said:
Most disappointing is the obvious lack of leadership, enthusiasm, aggression, ANYTHING, especially from Gaspar. Football looks like torture to this bloke. I think he'd rather go to the dentist.
..and to think he was reinstated into the leadership group :spin
 
Re: Gas

Hungry said:
Phantom, agree with you and Bob.

Gaspar and Kellaway have battled hard over the years but they are now finished. Their disposal is a liability, especially on the Telstra Dome surface, and the pace has gone - bring them out for a windy MCG only!

Most disappointing is the obvious lack of leadership, enthusiasm, aggression, ANYTHING, especially from Gaspar. Football looks like torture to this bloke. I think he'd rather go to the dentist.

At 30 years of age, with over 10 years experience in senior footy, it is just not good enough to be introverted on the field.

Looking forward to the match committee making a stand with both these blokes spending time at Coburg - we desperately need the next generation coming through.

Totally agree.

I don't think Kellaway has been as bad as Gaspar over the years in the sense that he: 1) hasn't been overpaid like Gaspar; 2) has shown more motivation over the journey (i.e. at least he doesn't drop his head like Gaspar does all the time) and; 3) his foot skill isn't as bad as Gaspar's either. Maybe Gaspar's been a better stopper, but that's about it.

Anyway, the point is both have been reflective of the RFC: mediocre players with gaping deficiencies in their game but have survived to play countless years at RFC never the less. The bleeding hearts will say I'm bagging great servants of the club, but I am not interested in emotion. I'm only interested in the RFC having a playing list of superior quality and  us not having to laud or make heroes out of what have been mediocre players in comparison with what other clubs put out on the ground from week to week, year to year.

The scary thing is though at the RFC, we have a batch of players coming through who are in that exact Kellaway/Gaspar mould who we are gonna play for years on end....
 
Re: Gas

Gaspar looked 'LOST' plain and simple.

See how he goes Friday.

Chin up GaSSY !!!!!!!!!
 
Re: Gas

taraba said:
I am being realistic now when I say the bloke is not up to it any more.

There was a stage in the game where a Bulldog player was pretty much running into an open goal and the only Tiger around was Gaspar. He was on his man about ten meters away from the goals and he just stood there and spectated. Could have given a chase or applied a little bit of pressure but nope. Nothing. Even his opponent (think Morgan) shoved him in the back and told him to go and chase. There was just no desperation or resistance. He's gone and I'd rather play Razor down back than him or definitely Thursty when he's fit.

I sawthis on the winners last night, dont remmber it during the game but did see it and thought it was disgraceful.  The bulldogs player who was on Gas got stuck into him about it too.  I have always rated Gaspar but that pathetic effort alone andlack of want or will during it needs ot seriously be addressed and if we had someone to come in I would drop him for that passage of play alone as an example that people cannot get away with that.  It was terrible and is the first time I have ever said a bad word about Darren Gaspar, but if one of our most experienced and highest paid players puts in an effort like that, our club is going nowhere.
 
Re: Gas

Whilst Gaspar was disappointing Friday night he had a good 2005 so he deserves some reprieve.We are not exactly flushed with defenders to take over from him & Kellaway.