Tigers were not deserving to make the top 8 but either were a few who did make it. Yes Tigers only beat one team int area top 8 and need to improve that although we did get within 3 points of Saints and draw with Bulldogs and give Hawthorn a run the first time around too, so there were all up 4 games we could have/should have won out of the top 8. Importantly we won the games we should have and that's a marked improvement and something to build on.
Why should Swans be more deserving when they only beat Saints once, the only team out of top 8. Why is Adelaide more deserving, only beaten North once the only team out of the top 8. Why Collingwood, who only played the top 3 teams once each.
The Tigers were not deserving but I would argue the same for Swans and Adelaide and arguably Collingwood. Why are the Tigers not just as deserving as those teams to have mae the 8 and at least gained some finals experience for the future?