diggler said:You lot will still be dreaming that Richo will win us a flag in 2015!!!
Move on clowns, we will never be a successful side with Richo, Period!!!
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
diggler said:You lot will still be dreaming that Richo will win us a flag in 2015!!!
Move on clowns, we will never be a successful side with Richo, Period!!!
White Czar said:Skills said:Why is Matthew Richardson still part of our plans in 2008?
I hope he is.
If Richo can play a Lynch type role playing in the square we will have a much better chance of winning a flag imo compared to Richmond without Richo.
craig said:All these sides contain players of a list that has finished last and 12th in the last two years and has performed poorly and we are putting them in proposed Premiership sides on stats. :![]()
Agreecraig said:Thanks Dyer'ere cos i thought Phanto had fallen off the trolley as he is such a concise poster. Yep i see what the thread means but i for the life of me cannot see finals and success with this list and a tougher draw.
craig said:Thanks Dyer'ere cos i thought Phanto had fallen off the trolley as he is such a concise poster. Yep i see what the thread means but i for the life of me cannot see finals and success with this list and a tougher draw.
Phantom said:Here's another boredom breaker.
Over the last few weeks we've looked at the elements of successful sides. We've seen what they're composed of, and what is recruited as a consequence thereof.
So,
If we had to line up for a Grand Final today, how would we line up?
Phantom said:craig said:Thanks Dyer'ere cos i thought Phanto had fallen off the trolley as he is such a concise poster. Yep i see what the thread means but i for the life of me cannot see finals and success with this list and a tougher draw.
Hi Craig,
Sorry to throw you.
If you go back to the first post on the first page, this will explain the context.
Phantom said:Here's another boredom breaker.
Over the last few weeks we've looked at the elements of successful sides. We've seen what they're composed of, and what is recruited as a consequence thereof.
So,
If we had to line up for a Grand Final today, how would we line up?
If the context isn't clear, it was merely a mental exercise using what we'd learnt from the common structures of successful sides and applying it to the list that we currently had.
Nothing devious, just fun.
Ghost of Punt Road said:How would we line up?
The same way the Richmond team has lined up for all the Grand Finals since 1982, at the turnstyles.