Jade Rawlings Fact File.. | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Jade Rawlings Fact File..

rosy23 said:
For what it's worth Jordan was one of our better ranked players according to dream team and supercoach stats.

Jordie...that he was which was staggering to me as take real notice of DT and SC, on jacko ive said jackson has had his best season to date but today he and mcmahon were woeful, if u have taped the game u will see majority of mcmahons disposals not hitting their targets, look if the ball lands a meter or 2 in front of the intended target and he is able to run onto the ball and clear away thats fine as we are still in possession but to many times his kicks went to 2 on 1 contests or over the head or at their feet and melb just cleared it away...it was as bright as day to see this....Take a look at the tape again and let me know if more than 3 of lids dispoals didnt hit their target i know of atleast 2 handballs which werent perefct, cuz too apart from a few up and unders but generally fine...Both lids and Cuz worked hard off the ball too, had the most tackles (Lids 6 and Cuz 5)....

On a different note, White and Nahas too thought they worked really hard toady also with 6 tackles each
 
rosy23 said:
More favoured players on here weren't overly efficient either. Lids' disposal 50%, Cousins' 67%, Riewoldt 55%, Morton 55%. Most of our players had an ordinary day in one way or another. .

yep give the lady a cigar....dont let the facts get in the way of a good witchhunt :o
 
WesternTiger said:
How can you have an effective disposal rate of 48% but only have 3 clangers?
An ineffective disposal isn't always kicking straight to the opposition. For example kicking a behind is considered ineffective.