Re: Will Jake cop a week or two
paddy ryders was worse, imho kingy will get off....
graystar1 said:
paddy ryders was worse, imho kingy will get off....
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Jake King
- Thread starter thejinx
- Start date
Re: Will Jake cop a week or two
As this is Jake King he will be lucky he the AFL doesn't refer him to the Hague War Crimes court on charges of genocide
As this is Jake King he will be lucky he the AFL doesn't refer him to the Hague War Crimes court on charges of genocide
Re: Will Jake cop a week or two
Posted on another thread yesterday that because it is Jake he will go.
graystar1 said:
Posted on another thread yesterday that because it is Jake he will go.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
I was surprised he did cop something when he kicked Gibson in the nuts last week.
But I'll be pleasantly surprised if he didn't cop a week or 2 for the trip.
I was surprised he did cop something when he kicked Gibson in the nuts last week.
But I'll be pleasantly surprised if he didn't cop a week or 2 for the trip.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
Tiger King facing five-match ban
I would personally burn AFL House to the ground.
Tiger King facing five-match ban
I would personally burn AFL House to the ground.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
For gods sake - enough is enough with the AFL's hate campaign against Jakey. I dont have the slightest memory of this so called second incident. Would not be surprised if the MRP will look at another incident they would have normally ignored now just like the garbage that went on with the Adl sooks last year. Another example of the Jake King rule. When is Richmond as a club going to say to the AFL that this blatant smear campaign against King is on the nose. It seems there are elements out there deliberatly trying to interfere with the carreer of this man. Pehaps Jake should gather all the video evidence of the pathetic umpire decions and bad press and over the top lopsided suspensions and take the AFL to task in the courts. This needs to stop now as it is rubbish... End of Rant.
For gods sake - enough is enough with the AFL's hate campaign against Jakey. I dont have the slightest memory of this so called second incident. Would not be surprised if the MRP will look at another incident they would have normally ignored now just like the garbage that went on with the Adl sooks last year. Another example of the Jake King rule. When is Richmond as a club going to say to the AFL that this blatant smear campaign against King is on the nose. It seems there are elements out there deliberatly trying to interfere with the carreer of this man. Pehaps Jake should gather all the video evidence of the pathetic umpire decions and bad press and over the top lopsided suspensions and take the AFL to task in the courts. This needs to stop now as it is rubbish... End of Rant.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
can't argue he deserves to go for the trip.
however, its his inability to get paid a free kick the club should be questioning, and occaisionally a free going against him, that doesn't get paid if it was someone else infringing.
can't argue he deserves to go for the trip.
however, its his inability to get paid a free kick the club should be questioning, and occaisionally a free going against him, that doesn't get paid if it was someone else infringing.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
For what? The trip? Sure it was there. I call it myself on here late Friday night or early Saturday. But 3 - 4 weeks?! Get off it. Even with his record and carryover it is only 2 at most.
If you are including the Dempster hit can you please explain to me what happened because like most on this site we don't think there was anything in it and that is without our rose coloured glasses on.
Surprised some are not advocating for him to be rubbed out for the Jones hit!
Freezer said:
For what? The trip? Sure it was there. I call it myself on here late Friday night or early Saturday. But 3 - 4 weeks?! Get off it. Even with his record and carryover it is only 2 at most.
If you are including the Dempster hit can you please explain to me what happened because like most on this site we don't think there was anything in it and that is without our rose coloured glasses on.
Surprised some are not advocating for him to be rubbed out for the Jones hit!
Re: Jake King (Merged)
Can someone tell me what Qtr this Dempter incident took place as I have NFI.
Can someone tell me what Qtr this Dempter incident took place as I have NFI.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
Yeah same. I saw the game live and the replay and didnt notice the incident.schnipper said:
Re: Jake King (Merged)
No. Probably with our relationship with the MRP, Rancey will cop a love letter for staging.
Ryder's was far worse than Jake's. We'll see.....
GEDS1 said:
No. Probably with our relationship with the MRP, Rancey will cop a love letter for staging.
Ryder's was far worse than Jake's. We'll see.....
Re: Jake King (Merged)
He should plead provocation, the maggots are inciting him.
Carryover Monopoly points still dogging him from the Adelaide frame-up.
U2Tigers said:
He should plead provocation, the maggots are inciting him.
Carryover Monopoly points still dogging him from the Adelaide frame-up.
Re: Jake King (Merged)
i would have less sympathy for Jake if the umpires actually awarded him (a) the free kicks he deserves (b) only paid the frees against him where he infringes. Where the benefit of any doubt is concerned he doesn't get it from them. Hell, he had a 3 grab mark also not paid on Friday night. If he had held it any longer he could have been drawing a pension. However he will feel the full force of the AFL/MRP etc.
I know I am drawing examples from different seasons - but I can't forget how blokes like Judd (when he threw the elbow back & split Pavlich's cheek open) - can get nothing & Jake faces possibly 5 weeks out of the game for a trip that should have been a free to Milne & I haven't seen the off the ball incident but suggestions is it's not too bad. How many weeks did big bad Barry get for cold cocking Staker ?
i would have less sympathy for Jake if the umpires actually awarded him (a) the free kicks he deserves (b) only paid the frees against him where he infringes. Where the benefit of any doubt is concerned he doesn't get it from them. Hell, he had a 3 grab mark also not paid on Friday night. If he had held it any longer he could have been drawing a pension. However he will feel the full force of the AFL/MRP etc.
I know I am drawing examples from different seasons - but I can't forget how blokes like Judd (when he threw the elbow back & split Pavlich's cheek open) - can get nothing & Jake faces possibly 5 weeks out of the game for a trip that should have been a free to Milne & I haven't seen the off the ball incident but suggestions is it's not too bad. How many weeks did big bad Barry get for cold cocking Staker ?
<
Pre and post draft rising star whipping boys.
|
A consensus player rating system - preliminary discussion
>