-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
James Podsiadly is training with RFC!
- Thread starter crackertiger
- Start date
Rchmond has unsucessfully approached AFL to try and get a rule change that would have allowed Podsiadly to be rookie listed.
Podsiadly is 1 yr to old for mature age rookie listing because he has previously been on an AFL list. However, richmond approached AFL because Podsiadly was only ever on a rookie list with pies in 2002, however was unsucessful in their approach.
Podsiadly has been training with the tigers and Wallace has hopes of turning him into a mobile defender (even though he kicked 66 goals in 16 games for Werribee this season).
Only way he will end up with us now is via PSD. Provding Wallace thinks he is worth a punt.
Podsiadly is 1 yr to old for mature age rookie listing because he has previously been on an AFL list. However, richmond approached AFL because Podsiadly was only ever on a rookie list with pies in 2002, however was unsucessful in their approach.
Podsiadly has been training with the tigers and Wallace has hopes of turning him into a mobile defender (even though he kicked 66 goals in 16 games for Werribee this season).
Only way he will end up with us now is via PSD. Provding Wallace thinks he is worth a punt.
This means they are at least pretty keen on him.
Couldnt see him being taken over Kingsley and they are highly unlikley to take both.
Couldnt see him being taken over Kingsley and they are highly unlikley to take both.
So if it is OK for Essendon how come it isn't for everyone else.... ?
http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=307117
I now it is special consideration, but well, I don't know.....
:-\
http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&spg=display&articleid=307117
I now it is special consideration, but well, I don't know.....
:-\
Don't think anyone would begrudge the Bummers the opportunity to slip Rama to the rookie list considering his circumstances.feisty tige said:
Would expect the same for Lonergan if he was outside the general parameters for rookieing a player.
Both these guys are exceptional circumstances, not just someone who has been tried but didn't quite make it as in Pods case.
feisty tige said:
I'd hope if we had a player in similar circumstances that other clubs would be accepting.
Good luck to Rama.