Josh Hunt | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Josh Hunt

Dyer Disciple

Tiger Legend
Oct 1, 2007
6,963
1
For the punters and dream team peeps out there.

He's announced in the last hour he is taking the full reconstruction surgery and will take the full 12mths out, as opposed to the Malceski artificial ligament "miracle" surgery. Geelongs medicos and his surgeon advised him to take the traditional surgery.
 
Iit was an nothing incident that caused the injury. Just look like a regulation bump from Medhurst(I think it was) and poor Hunt's knee collapsed simply under him. Bad luck indeed. :-\
 
Dyer Disciple said:
For the punters and dream team peeps out there.

He's announced in the last hour he is taking the full reconstruction surgery and will take the full 12mths out, as opposed to the Malceski artificial ligament "miracle" surgery. Geelongs medicos and his surgeon advised him to take the traditional surgery.

The ACL surgery had by Malceski is rare for a simple reason, only players with a tear usually throught the middle of the ligament can have this synthetic graft if i recall correctly if both ends of the ligament are still in tact to the joint.

Usually if the ligament does not present in this way then the ligament ends must be reattatched to the joint of the knee and it is in this area that the extended layoff results with healing obviously slower and taking a lot longer as the ligament itself is grafted back as opposed to having two ends grafted in the middle with synthetic reinforcement (gortex tyupe material i think is used).

MRI of the knee will tell the tale of what surgery is beneficial, on the whole the majority of ACLs are complete graftting of ligamentus tissue back to its original origin points of the knee joint.

ACL tears that can be repaired artificially are on the whole much less common as its usually a shaearing force through the sideways movement of the knee that tears the ligament from its hub of origin, and a common reason depending on whether the knee is bent inwards or outwards that the medial ligamnet (on inside of knee) or lateral ligament on (outside) will often tear also.
 
Dyer Disciple said:
For the punters and dream team peeps out there.

He's announced in the last hour he is taking the full reconstruction surgery and will take the full 12mths out, as opposed to the Malceski artificial ligament "miracle" surgery. Geelongs medicos and his surgeon advised him to take the traditional surgery.
Sensible move
 
craig said:
The ACL surgery had by Malceski is rare for a simple reason, only players with a tear usually throught the middle of the ligament can have this synthetic graft if i recall correctly if both ends of the ligament are still in tact to the joint.

Usually if the ligament does not present in this way then the ligament ends must be reattatched to the joint of the knee and it is in this area that the extended layoff results with healing obviously slower and taking a lot longer as the ligament itself is grafted back as opposed to having two ends grafted in the middle with synthetic reinforcement (gortex tyupe material i think is used).

MRI of the knee will tell the tale of what surgery is beneficial, on the whole the majority of ACLs are complete graftting of ligamentus tissue back to its original origin points of the knee joint.

ACL tears that can be repaired artificially are on the whole much less common as its usually a shaearing force through the sideways movement of the knee that tears the ligament from its hub of origin, and a common reason depending on whether the knee is bent inwards or outwards that the medial ligamnet (on inside of knee) or lateral ligament on (outside) will often tear also.

I disagree slightly. What you say is spot on, but i think it is more to do with they are erring on the side of caution than take the only path available to them. For the record he also significantly damaged his medial. Though that is more a case of what is holding up surgery (due to swelling) than any further limiting options.

The facts are, no matter what people claim otherwise, this "Malceski" surgery to (simplify terminolgy) is still unproven. Only three AFL players have had it, with only one success story (the other two refcently retired). There are some well known failures. It's a bit of a gamble. One of the biggest problems with it is it is too early to say if the artifical ligament lasts, or even how long it lasts.

I believe he had the option to have it done and chose not to take the risk (but that is my interpretation, I don't know this).