i don't know what some of you fellow posters think of the current level of journalism we have to put up with . i for one think many 15 year olds could do just as well . take that report on richmond in the sun last week , all they seem to do was state the obvious and rehash some statistics . there are posters here that could have done a far better job with far less resources.
how about we have a section where we rate the journalists and their articles. we could put the article up for discussion and vote for a rating .after a few articles it would be obvious if the journalist is worth reading or just someone who dishes out bull manure .
thoughts?????????????????????????????????
how about we have a section where we rate the journalists and their articles. we could put the article up for discussion and vote for a rating .after a few articles it would be obvious if the journalist is worth reading or just someone who dishes out bull manure .
thoughts?????????????????????????????????