Spanish Prisoner said:Agreed. It would be terrible. Yesterday's man is not the right person to lead you forward.
We need to either re-sign Wallace or find a new man for a new era....
we need to re-sign wallace? why on earth would we do that.
Spanish Prisoner said:Agreed. It would be terrible. Yesterday's man is not the right person to lead you forward.
We need to either re-sign Wallace or find a new man for a new era....
"adios"Spanish Prisoner said:Agreed. It would be terrible. Yesterday's man is not the right person to lead you forward.
We need to either re-sign Wallace or find a new man for a new era....
walhalla tiger said:"adios"
tiges said:we need to re-sign wallace? why on earth would we do that.
you obviously need time in guantamano bay Jose.....too close your mindSpanish Prisoner said:Because maybe he is not the cause of what is going on? Maybe it wouldn't have mattered who coached? Maybe it is the RFC that is the problem and not Wallace?
Have you thought of that?
For the record I am not saying this is my view - but an open mind is important....
geoffryprettyboy said:That word reminds me of that *smile* Sol Trujillo.
Spanish Prisoner said:Agreed. It would be terrible. Yesterday's man is not the right person to lead you forward.
We need to either re-sign Wallace or find a new man for a new era....
BladeTiger said:Agree, I suspect Hird and Watson have had some meaningful conversations with Sheeds on this subject.
Spanish Prisoner said:Agreed. It would be terrible. Yesterday's man is not the right person to lead you forward.
We need to either re-sign Wallace or find a new man for a new era....