I am sure there must be some correlation between Hawthorn's inaccuracy and ours given Dimma has moulded his game plan on the Hawthorn system. I am just not smart enough to work it out.
Leysy Days said:As TOT touched on, and as we raised last year to not a lot of support, (actually most thought, probably rightly ;D we were going mad) there are two sides to our goalkicking woes.
One is that we are missing too many set shots. This needs to be improved. Absolutely.
Secondly though, is that whilst we can get better, due to our gameplan we will never be an accurate team in front of goal.
Reason - apart from one or two players we all push forward & overcrowd our forward line to lock it in, we also go to the boundary when there's no clear target to force throw-ins. This is good in that we get the game played in our front half, the trade off is we often won't have time & space to execute our shot ergo our poor goal to point & goal to inside 50 ratios.
We can improve but unless we're under very little pressure from the opposition under the current structure we're never going to be a precise team in front of goal.
BT Tiger said:I didn't think they did a lot of goal kicking practice at training to reduce pressure on the players hammies. Do they actually practice this element of the game as a section of training or is it just as a warm up drill.?
Until last year I thought jack was a dead eye for goal. Now I'm not so sure. His technique looks the same, maybe now he's expected to kick bags of goals he's feeling the pinch mentally and it affects his conversion.
Leysy Days said:One is that we are missing too many set shots. This needs to be improved. Absolutely.
Leysy Days said:Reason - apart from one or two players we all push forward & overcrowd our forward line to lock it in, we also go to the boundary when there's no clear target to force throw-ins. This is good in that we get the game played in our front half, the trade off is we often won't have time & space to execute our shot ergo our poor goal to point & goal to inside 50 ratios.
Leysy Days said:Reason - apart from one or two players we all push forward & overcrowd our forward line to lock it in, we also go to the boundary when there's no clear target to force throw-ins. This is good in that we get the game played in our front half, the trade off is we often won't have time & space to execute our shot ergo our poor goal to point & goal to inside 50 ratios.
We can improve but unless we're under very little pressure from the opposition under the current structure we're never going to be a precise team in front of goal.
Re Dempsey, lets hope it was a myth! He was a terrible kick.tommystigers said:We won't win games against the good teams if this is not addressed. You don't get enough chances.
I remember a story, maybe a myth, about Gary Dempsey when he was at Footascray. He would place a rubbish behind and between the goals and practice trying to kick the ball into it.
If three cargo containers were placed end to end behind the goals I doubt some of our players would get anywhere near them.
The I50 ratio to goals scored must be abysmal. 10 goals 20 behinds is about par for our performance in2012.
btoz_01 said:I remember reading some time ago that the Sports Biomechanics experts would only allow players to practice a number of set shots for goal at training. Riewoldt had to get a neighbours kid to go to the park with him so he could practice kicking for goal outside the footy club
How do they expect to get thier kicking for goal right if they cant practice it?
Dyer'ere said:I think there are a lot of factors impeding our goal kicking accuracy atm.
First, I'd say is who's doing the kicking and how. The side we fielded Saturday was a mix of our best forwards our, bottom dozen and our vying for a game lads.
michael roach said:And on the weekend two of our more average kickers in Mcguane and White showed the way in how to kick straight for goal.
TOT70 said:Ya gotta laugh at this game sometimes.
Pettard kicks the winning goal, finally, after a long run of misses and immediately gets the signal to leave the field, no more football for you today, son. We can't have any more of that.
Can’t we leave him on the field and take off some of the guys who kicked points instead?
TOT70 said:Yep. We will never get away with missing 5-7 direct shots at goal in a game against a decent team.
Pretty much every team kicks towards the boundary now, in preference to turning the ball over 20m directly in front of the goal. Turn it over there to a Goddard or a Shaun Burgoyne and you are 15 seconds away from another ad-break and a delirious rant from the other team’s Cheer-squad.
This is where we need to get better. We spend far too much time locking the ball in the forward line for the reward of a few points. It is unrealistic to expect that the ball will never get out the back and, when it does, it is usually an easy run in for a goal to the other team. After all, that is where the space is.
Those phases of play need to end with a goal to us, not a handful of points and a goal to them. It gets back to kicking, we miss too many set shots, we miss too many long bombs from outside 50 (Houli, Martin, Deledio, Newman), too many snaps (Titch Edwards, Nahas) and too many balls end up around our crowded goal-square where they are scrubbed through for a rushed point.
TOT70 said:Ya gotta laugh at this game sometimes.
Pettard kicks the winning goal, finally, after a long run of misses and immediately gets the signal to leave the field, no more football for you today, son. We can't have any more of that.
Can’t we leave him on the field and take off some of the guys who kicked points instead?
Tigerflag2008 said:I am sure there must be some correlation between Hawthorn's inaccuracy and ours given Dimma has moulded his game plan on the Hawthorn system. I am just not smart enough to work it out.
Tigers of Old said:Chocco has been working on our goal kicking.