Krak 2007 Make or Break V2 [Merged]

[IanG]

my thoughts exactly

its like a 38 possesion game at coburg gave him the right to think he could do like wise to a disciplined and superior swans outfit

it shouldnt take until round 17 to realise whether his papers are getting stamped or not

quite comical really

Wallace's mind was obviously made up about Krak at least 2 months ago, as has been stated he had to bring him back for this match based on his form for Coburg otherwise he loses credibility with the players. That doesn't mean he won't delist him at the end of the year.

 

[IrockZ]

my thoughts exactly

its like a 38 possesion game at coburg gave him the right to think he could do like wise to a disciplined and superior swans outfit

it shouldnt take until round 17 to realise whether his papers are getting stamped or not

quite comical really

Wallace's mind was obviously made up about Krak at least 2 months ago, as has been stated he had to bring him back for this match based on his form for Coburg otherwise he loses credibility with the players. That doesn't mean he won't delist him at the end of the year.

its a stupid policy

if he's gone next year he shouldnt be played at all, good form or not at coburg

he's had enough chances

 

[IanG]

Wallace's mind was obviously made up about Krak at least 2 months ago, as has been stated he had to bring him back for this match based on his form for Coburg otherwise he loses credibility with the players. That doesn't mean he won't delist him at the end of the year.

its a stupid policy

if he's gone next year he shouldnt be played at all, good form or not at coburg

he's had enough chances

Its stupid to pick players on the basis of form?

 

[U2Tigers]

Wallace's mind was obviously made up about Krak at least 2 months ago, as has been stated he had to bring him back for this match based on his form for Coburg otherwise he loses credibility with the players. That doesn't mean he won't delist him at the end of the year.

its a stupid policy

if he's gone next year he shouldnt be played at all, good form or not at coburg

he's had enough chances

Its stupid to pick players on the basis of form?

yes when its Krakouers FALSE form at Coburg.

Kraks a good VFL player - hasn't commitment for the highest level.

 

[Coughlan24]

Went on saturday and just from his body language he's gone. Tambling on the other hand his contesting improved a helluva lot, was going in for the ball and not out waiting on the fringe's.

 

[Tigers of Old]

my thoughts exactly

its like a 38 possesion game at coburg gave him the right to think he could do like wise to a disciplined and superior swans outfit

it shouldnt take until round 17 to realise whether his papers are getting stamped or not

quite comical really

Wallace's mind was obviously made up about Krak at least 2 months ago, as has been stated he had to bring him back for this match based on his form for Coburg otherwise he loses credibility with the players. That doesn't mean he won't delist him at the end of the year.

its a stupid policy

if he's gone next year he shouldnt be played at all, good form or not at coburg

he's had enough chances

That was my thoughts too.
Nothing was going to change or has changed.
I'm all for rewarding form but you'd want them to be a part of your future if you're to give them games.

 

[mb64]

Wallace's mind was obviously made up about Krak at least 2 months ago, as has been stated he had to bring him back for this match based on his form for Coburg otherwise he loses credibility with the players. That doesn't mean he won't delist him at the end of the year.

its a stupid policy

if he's gone next year he shouldnt be played at all, good form or not at coburg

he's had enough chances

Its stupid to pick players on the basis of form?

Yes,if we picked a side on form we wouldn't field a side each week.

 

[Tiger74]

It boogles the mind that wallace started Krak in the middle on the weekend as if a good game at Coburg was going to translate straight into him breaking even with Bolton or Kirk.

Either Terry seems to have a blind spot on Kraks ability/endeavour to play midfield or that was one last try for him to prove himself or be delisted.

Looks like delisting.

my thoughts exactly

its like a 38 possesion game at coburg gave him the right to think he could do like wise to a disciplined and superior swans outfit

it shouldnt take until round 17 to realise whether his papers are getting stamped or not

quite comical really

I think this is more of a case of "your a$$ is on the line, but you played a gun game for Coburg. I'm throwing you in the middle to give you one last chance to show you have what it takes, and your not just a VFL hero".

Given his performance, I think Krak failed to step up to the challenge :

 

[Freezer]

Given his performance, I think Krak failed to step up to the challenge :

Not surprising really, considering he's done the same thing over and over and over and over and over...

 

[Tiger74]

Given his performance, I think Krak failed to step up to the challenge :

Not surprising really, considering he's done the same thing over and over and over and over and over...

I sadly I agree

 

[Rosy]

Heard on the abc news that Krak's charges have been upgraded today from grevious bodily harm to assault causing grevious bodily harm or some such charge that sounded similar to me. They said he faces up to 20 years in jail but he intends to plead not guilty when the case is heard in October.

 

[Phar Ace]

Heard on the abc news that Krak's charges have been upgraded today from grevious bodily harm to assault causing grevious bodily harm or some such charge that sounded similar to me. They said he faces up to 20 years in jail but he intends to plead not guilty when the case is heard in October.

Interesting, weren't they downgraded previously - maybe back where they were originally.

Not making excuses for him, but this hanging over his head now can't help his footy from here on in. Thought it might have had the effect of getting everything out of the situation he's in by focussing hard on his footy - but sadly there are no signs it has had anything but a negative effect.

 

[Scoop]

I dont mind Wallace giving him another chance becuase when we have a list of so many sub-standard types it's hard not to make six changes and bring in another two or three who you know won't be there next year.

Play the guys who's form warrants it and then drop them if they re not up too it. I would not be shocked to see Krak get another week or two in the big time. Then dropped and gone for good. He had a supposed massive pre-season and this was to be the year he showed how good he was. It never happened for whatever reason.

He has nothing to complain about, he got a fair go and played a 100 odd games at one club. A great effort. It's just time for the RFC to cut him loose and move on. It was probably time three years ago if every one is honest. But it's long over due and I think everyone is know sure of that move.

 

[jb03]

Heard on the abc news that Krak's charges have been upgraded today from grevious bodily harm to assault causing grevious bodily harm or some such charge that sounded similar to me. They said he faces up to 20 years in jail but he intends to plead not guilty when the case is heard in October.

Interesting, weren't they downgraded previously - maybe back where they were originally.

Not making excuses for him, but this hanging over his head now can't help his footy from here on in. Thought it might have had the effect of getting everything out of the situation he's in by focussing hard on his footy - but sadly there are no signs it has had anything but a negative effect.

Might want to change your avatar farase

 

[diggler]

Heard on the abc news that Krak's charges have been upgraded today from grevious bodily harm to assault causing grevious bodily harm or some such charge that sounded similar to me. They said he faces up to 20 years in jail but he intends to plead not guilty when the case is heard in October.

A wise person once told me Rosy,"Fairwell & Good Riddance"!!!!!

 

[Phar Ace]

Heard on the abc news that Krak's charges have been upgraded today from grevious bodily harm to assault causing grevious bodily harm or some such charge that sounded similar to me. They said he faces up to 20 years in jail but he intends to plead not guilty when the case is heard in October.

Interesting, weren't they downgraded previously - maybe back where they were originally.

Not making excuses for him, but this hanging over his head now can't help his footy from here on in. Thought it might have had the effect of getting everything out of the situation he's in by focussing hard on his footy - but sadly there are no signs it has had anything but a negative effect.

Might want to change your avatar farase

Not gonna quit until the fat lady in your Avatar sings - statistically possible for him to get 15 Brownlow votes yet this season :rofl

 

[Phar Ace]

Heard on the abc news that Krak's charges have been upgraded today from grevious bodily harm to assault causing grevious bodily harm or some such charge that sounded similar to me. They said he faces up to 20 years in jail but he intends to plead not guilty when the case is heard in October.

A wise person once told me Rosy,"Fairwell & Good Riddance"!!!!!

That wasnt one person riddler - it was a cacophony