List Management Strategy | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

List Management Strategy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill James
  • Start date Start date
B

Bill James

Guest
Article by TW on the Richmond website includes reference to the "future list management strategy". He indicates that there is a trade-off between early draft picks and trades for senior players, but whatever happens in the next few weeks will be in line with the strategy.

Obviously the boys have been reading PRE and taking notes.
 
Good article by our coach.

He really puts things into perspective. "With nothing really achieved from 2005........except for a better effort & blooding young kids"

TW really doesn't want to blow up the Tiger bubble just in case it bursts 11 rounds into next season.
 
I thought it was good news that we have a list management strategy as well as a gameplan now. Obviously a yawn for everyone else.
 
geoffryprettyboy said:
Good article by our coach.

He really puts things into perspective. "With nothing really achieved from 2005........except for a better effort & blooding young kids"

TW really doesn't want to blow up the Tiger bubble just in case it bursts 11 rounds into next season.

Fair enough too. The last thing I'd ever do as coach of the RFC would be to blow the team trumpet before we'd done anything.
 
Bill James said:
I thought it was good news that we have a list management strategy as well as a gameplan now. Obviously a yawn for everyone else.

Our slow responses BJ, may be due to the fact we have never understood this concept for many years at Richmond. Let's learn to accept a game plan first and the business of list management will slowly evolve. If we do become successful in the next few years, we can sit here and state many wonderful theories behind the management of our list. ;)
 
Yep, list management strategy is probably one of those things you espouse after you have won a GF and make the other clubs believe you have and stick to one.

Bit like a no DH policy when half the list has been there longer than the coach.
 
This is the single most important thing that has killed the Tigers since 82. I love Greg Miller but his early days at the Tigers just reinforced this, but since TW has come aboard I think the team of GM & TW is doing better, however as TW wrote in his article we were in the box seat last year due to our wooden spoon finish.

TW knows we are up against it this year as he has stated that he wont (& should not) trade top picks for good players even though we need to fill the hole in the middle of our donut team ie few quality mid age players on the list (22-25yo).

Therefore we are left with trading expendable players for other clubs expendable players - which is hard to do and even harder to succeed. Or alternatively trading expendable players for other clubs draft picks, which is even more difficult! Of course the latter strategy makes the list even younger and so improvement on the field will be jeopardised in the short to medium term.

IMHO without alot of judicious trading for decent players we will have a glimmer of hope of rising up the ladder in 2007/08, (ie hopefully Richo, Brown, Lids and Bling all click together), but realistically no shot at a premiership until 2010 ie after today's established stars are retired and assuming the majority of our rookies of the past 2 years turn out to be top liners. :-\

I think the RFC will be up against it for some time due to very shaky foundations that TW & GM are building on, but at least now they have a strategy.
 
maverick said:
I think the RFC will be up against it for some time due to very shaky foundations that TW & GM are building on, but at least now they have a strategy.

Maverick, the big names who are appointed in the top jobs are paid to restructure, rationalise & introduce processes that will have immediate impact. Let's not use the "shaky foundation" as a reason for the transition to take longer. Richmond cant afford to go backwards...not after the three pre-seasons of significant change.