Lowlife of the week award. | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Lowlife of the week award.

taztiger4 said:
In this case, Silvagni has been found guilty, by a jury I will add which having ben a juror twice, its bloody hard to find someone guilty
Click to expand...

very.

if you get found guilty in a sex case,

you are substantially guilty
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
taztiger4 said:
In this case, Silvagni has been found guilty, by a jury I will add which having ben a juror twice, its bloody hard to find someone guilty
Click to expand...
Yeah, I jumped the gun. I've never heard of 'digitally' penetrating or digital rape before....

Why is it hard?
 
TigerForce said:
Yeah, I jumped the gun. I've never heard of 'digitally' penetrating or digital rape before....

Why is it hard?
Click to expand...

Thats a phrase they use for using the hands, fingers = digits.

Why do you think its hard to prosecute on rape cases? Its pretty obvious, so many rape cases are he says, she says type scenarios, its why people that want to rape try and isolate women, no independent witnesses.

A conviction will likely need more than just the girls say so, hence why rape cases invariably have a low conviction ratio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
mrposhman said:
Thats a phrase they use for using the hands, fingers = digits.

Why do you think its hard to prosecute on rape cases? Its pretty obvious, so many rape cases are he says, she says type scenarios, its why people that want to rape try and isolate women, no independent witnesses.

A conviction will likely need more than just the girls say so, hence why rape cases invariably have a low conviction ratio.
Click to expand...
I thought taz meant 'generally', anyway, there just seems to be little info on this whole case to understand how and what really happened.
 
what an entitled calculating nasty *smile*.

four huge breaches of trust

1. The victim
2. His 'girlFriend'
3. his male friend, and
3. His family (home)
 
Last edited:
TigerForce said:
I thought taz meant 'generally', anyway, there just seems to be little info on this whole case to understand how and what really happened.
Click to expand...

Just the immediate stuff they have released around tampering with evidence around a friends uber receipts to make it look like he wasn't there shows some level of deception. We'll never be given all the details, you rarely do, they are known by the people that were in the courtroom.
 
mrposhman said:
Just the immediate stuff they have released around tampering with evidence around a friends uber receipts to make it look like he wasn't there shows some level of deception. We'll never be given all the details, you rarely do, they are known by the people that were in the courtroom.
Click to expand...
Deception alright. All I read was that he went to bed with his girlfriend and then when the victim's boyfriend left, he went to her bed.....WTF is this d-head thinking?? 2 women in 1 night.
 
mrposhman said:
Thats a phrase they use for using the hands, fingers = digits.

Why do you think its hard to prosecute on rape cases? Its pretty obvious, so many rape cases are he says, she says type scenarios, its why people that want to rape try and isolate women, no independent witnesses.

A conviction will likely need more than just the girls say so, hence why rape cases invariably have a low conviction ratio.
Click to expand...
Agree. So to that end, without having read about this case until now, what’s the hard core, definitive proof behind this guilty verdict ? She said… he said. Girlfriend said (interesting). But so what ?

Altering the Uber receipt ? That could have been as he proferred, an action under the pressure of a false accusation.

There’s no body fluids. There’s no witnesses. So what was the actual proof of the action having been committed I wonder ?

As you say, these things are hard to get guilty verdicts on so there has to be some stuff being left out of this story, surely ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Redford said:
Agree. So to that end, without having read about this case until now, what’s the hard core, definitive proof behind this guilty verdict ? She said… he said. Girlfriend said (interesting). But so what ?

Altering the Uber receipt ? That could have been as he proferred, an action under the pressure of a false accusation.

There’s no body fluids. There’s no witnesses. So what was the actual proof of the action having been committed I wonder ?

As you say, these things are hard to get guilty verdicts on so there has to be some stuff being left out of this story, surely ?
Click to expand...

Yes, certain aspects are left out. If they weren't they would reveal law enforcement tradecraft.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
< Movies | Cricket >
Top Bottom