MLB 2012 - Giants Win!! | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

MLB 2012 - Giants Win!!

Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

No doubt the Giants are drumming up interest in Benitez. The Sox may not have a closer, but that doesn't mean we'll trade for over-priced junk like that.

And yeah CHB is a great nickname. The first few times you read SOSH you have no idea WTF is going on with all the nicknames.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Lay off our overpriced hacks.Let them retire in peace.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Why havent you cracked the inner sanctum of SOSH and got yourself accepted as a poster ? You didnt disclose your ear wax collection in the "Hobbies" section of the application form again did you ?
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

haha, yeah I have to stop doing that. I can post there though, I can just never say anything more than what those guys have already said.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Gee there are some hard core/deeply devoted people on that site. Have you seen the “What’s Todd Helton Worth” thread ? Bloody hell. Linear equations…MORP equations….FRAA’s …..WARP’s…geeez.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Yeah lol. I like my stats but these guys take it way beyond that.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Phantom should really get into baseball.His talents are lost on mere footy analysis.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

evo said:
Phantom should really get into baseball.His talents are lost on mere footy analysis.

I'd love to hear how Mark Prior is listed as 6'4 but "I stood next to him and its at least 6'6."
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Disco08 said:
No, the Giants are interested in dealing him.

Are you sure you have it the right way around? :-\

http://rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=MLB&id=1991
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

They should just go and get Cordero from the Nats, they have no need for a closer. They might lose 100 + games over in capital city
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

struggletown3121 said:
Are you sure you have it the right way around? :-\

The key words in the rotoworld piece are "San Francisco Chronicle".

I doubt they'll try for Cordero either Judge. They'll do what they did in 2003. There's enough bullpen talent on the roster that they can work something out.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Check this beauty out.


pMLB2-3080287dt.jpg
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

It has not one, but two cup holders in the arms. Those Americans think of everything.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

I wonder if it shoots fireworks during the 7th inning stretch.

I'd use 1 cup holder for my oversized Bonds bobble head."Dance you bastard,dance!"
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

His head may be huge but I bet his testicles are shrivelled.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Struggs you'd have to be pretty happy with ST so far. Every one of your ML hitters is looking fantastic. If Murton continues his progression, Pie is the real deal (looking good so far) and Guzman and Samardzija can contribute it could be a very good year for you. Of course, add Prior and Wood healthy and throwing well to that and it could be a great year, but I don't think many Cubs fans are holding their breath waiting for that to happen.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Disco08 said:
Struggs you'd have to be pretty happy with ST so far. Every one of your ML hitters is looking fantastic. If Murton continues his progression, Pie is the real deal (looking good so far) and Guzman and Samardzija can contribute it could be a very good year for you. Of course, add Prior and Wood healthy and throwing well to that and it could be a great year, but I don't think many Cubs fans are holding their breath waiting for that to happen.

Pleased but not excited.
I think the Cubs will be a great side to watch, with a potentially great offence.
If Lee, Soriano,Barrett and A-Ram get thumpin' then guys like Murton De Rosa and Jones should be able to cash in.
If Soriano can lead the NL with homers at RFK then he'll put balls a block back from the OF wall at Wrigley.
Throw in old Cliff Floyd if he's fit enough then well see loads of runs on the medway.

Problem being excluding Lee and Izturis (whos low power) the Cubbies are poor defensively.
I expect to see a lot of games won and lost into double figure runs for both sides.

Their outfield arms of Murton,Soriano and Jones are *smile* poor to be honest.
The pitching that looked unbeatable 3-4 years ago looks brittle,and downright ordinary if the big Z goes down(God help us :nailbiting perish the thought)

In a perfect world Z, Wood Prior Lilly and Hill would be a dominant rotation if fit.

Reality suggests Prior is *smile* both physically and mentally, Wood is more than likely going to make cameos from the pen and maybe even close if he holds together....would be an awesome closer IMO.
Lilly is unknown in the NL, but being a flyball pitcher at Wrigley scares me.
Hill is OK, but nothing really better than a 5th starter.
Marquis is coming off a horror season and i've no faith in him at all.
Dempster lost the plot last year too....lost faith there too.

Obviously Da Cubbies will improve, but not contend.
2 decent starters either midseason or next would go a long way toward solving that.

On Guzman and Pie, they're both highly touted and supposedly injury free and making solid progress.
We'll see....the Cubs fans are like Richmonds when it comes to overrating players.

One bloke the fans love is The Riot....Ryan Theriot.
Supposedly has real game and hustle, and can put a charge into the ball.
Lets follow him this season and see if he tracks upwards.
 
Re: MLB 2007 - Say NO to Clemens

Can't see why they'd pick up the worst pitcher in MLB last year for what, $7M when Guzman will surely be better?